By Yael T. Abouhalkah, Kansas City Star Editorial Board
When my daughter goes off to college this fall, she won't be carrying a Glock or any other kind of gun. But some students, after the Virginia Tech shootings a year ago, want to be able to pack heat on campus. It's a bad idea.
My daughter will be safer on campus than almost anyplace else, precisely because of laws that prohibit guns at almost all universities across the nation.
In fact, if students start carrying guns at her college, she becomes less safe.
The pro-gun lobby remains steadfast on wanting to "protect" students, as this story shows.
But the only fact that truly matters is whether school shootings have gone way up in recent years.
They haven't. In fact, they remain indelibly etched in our brains and on the front pages of newspapers precisely because shootings on college campuses are so rare.
The debate will continue, of course, stoked by the gun lobby and its patently ridiculous "let's arm everyone" campaign.
Keeping guns off campuses is the smart thing to do to keep students safe.









Delicious
Digg
ed hardy ed hardy ed hardy
ed hardy ed hardy
ed hardy clothing ed hardy clothing
ed hardy shop ed hardy shop
christian audigier christian audigier
ed hardy cheap ed hardy cheap
ed hardy outlet ed hardy outlet
ed hardy sale ed hardy sale
ed hardy store ed hardy store
ed hardy mens ed hardy mens
ed hardy womens ed hardy womens
ed hardy kids ed hardy kids ed hardy kids
No Such thing as a "Gun Free Campus"
The fact that you think there is, is sad to say the least. The Shooting at Virgina Tech was not by far the only College shooting. Every year, students are killed, raped, robbed, and beaten in Gun free zones. Your daughter is safer because law abading citizens cant carry? Im sure the criminal who was going to rob and rape your daughter will be stoped by an 8x11 peice of paper....
Once again a columnist calling others 'stupid'
If the idea is 'stupid', then by default so are those supporting it, Yael. This is yet another example of 'ad hominem' attacks, which are lame.
Why not just stick with whatever arguments you wish to make and be done with it? Why use these insulting tags that you bristle at when someone uses them with respect to YOUR ideas?
Personally, I agree with Rogue - if you don't want your kid armed, fine, but these gun-free zones are simply invitations for bad guys to do harm without a lot of fear of intervention.
Ross Balano: thanks for getting me off the pot about it - I have inherited a number of guns from my father and I'm going to get to a gun range and get the rust out. Home protection is a good idea too - I'd rather the police investigate the death of an intruder than have them try to find MY killer.
You know as much about guns Alphabet as you do smoking.....
I have a short question for you alphabet. How many people have been murdered on gun ranges, and how many have been murdered in "gun free zones" and school campus's?
You need to think a little alphabet before you engage that key board.......
One trained concealed carry permit holder could have ended the VT slaughter, just as the lady in Colorado ended the shooting at the church.
You don't want your daughter to carry, fine, but stop preventing the rest of us from defending her and you when the need arises.
I have no patience for the ignorance of your argument.
Proud life-time member of NRA, and certified card carrying member of the gun lobby. (See I "cling to my guns and my religion". Shameful ain't it.)