By The Kansas City Star Editorial Board
A message to the doubters of our justice system: The United States was founded on freedoms and based on the rule of law. It has worked for two centuries and been admired worldwide.
The new GOP talking points — expressing fear of justice working in an open courtroom, from a party that likes to wrap itself in the flag — are quite stunning.
The latest example is the reaction to the Obama administration’s decision to put mass murderer (OK, alleged but self-described) Khalid Sheik Mohammed on trial for planning the Sept. 11 attacks.
Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama called the idea of trying the most vile criminal in U.S. history in a U.S. criminal court where he would face the death sentence “dangerous,” “misguided” and “unnecessary.”
Since when is seeking justice misguided? Since when is exposing the worst of humanity to the bright light of the American judicial system dangerous?
We should note, it’s not entirely a GOP affliction. President Obama has tried to deflect the decision, saying it was up to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who noted, “We need not cower in the face of this enemy.”
Sessions hardly went rogue among his teeth-chattering party brethren. Kansas Sens. Sam Brownback and Pat Roberts are near the front of this chicken coop. Their opposition to the relocation of Guantanamo prisoners (even putting a hold on all presidential appointments this summer) was based on an unreasonable terror of terrorists.
Enough. The terrorists are real and they are nasty. They killed 3,000 innocents on our soil.
But they didn’t win and they’re not going to. They took down two towers and we invaded two countries. There’s a massive power imbalance, and it doesn’t swing to their side. Unless, of course, we ignore what makes us such a strong nation: Our unwavering commitment to freedom and justice.
Turn our back on those founding principles and the terrorists win. Maybe these newly timid Republicans can review the records and see how successful U.S. prosecutors have been in courtroom face-offs with terrorists. We prefer America-the-strong and American values. And America faces down evil, in public, without fear.
Crimes on American soil are best handled openly, in a U.S. courtroom. An open military tribunal could accomplish the same thing — as Nuremberg proved. But Guantanamo tribunals would be closed, preventing the world from witnessing how justice is accomplished in a free society.
So, what about the fears that the trial will provide Al Qaida a pulpit, expose sensitive American intelligence, open us to terror attacks?
First, this is a pulpit for American justice and it will diminish Al Qaida.
Plus, the intelligence needed to convict a man of an eight-year old crime is eight years old.
Finally, we’re already a terror target, and returning to the rule of law, proving ourselves to be a beacon of freedom, is our best defense.
So, buck up, we will prevail. And for those fearful, here are a few words of comfort from Franklin Delano Roosevelt:
“This great Nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself — nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance. In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory.”









Delicious
Digg
dsafd
Were a fine woman how few designer handbag decoration, had a section of fashionable favorable impression Thomas wylde Replica handbags, let your mood blossom in radiant splendor in the summer day, the delightful joy person's summer day fashionable Versace Replica handbags, let your delight and makings UP gets up! Sometimes the replica handbags looks like woman's label. A section elegant natural, material quality high quality Yves Saint Laurent Replica handbags , sees a woman's personal status and the makings sufficiently. This summer, regardless of being the color gorgeous leisure gucci shoulder bag, works the excellent dermis gucci messenger bag, has some unique details
designer pursehandbagsDiscount handbagsCheap handbagsMarni handbagsVersace handbagsThomaswylde handbagsJuicy Couture handbagsLoewe handbagsValentino handbagsAlexander Wang handbagsBottega Veneta handbagsKooba handbagsinsulated glassmarble composite slab|Marc Jacobs replica handbags|Bottega Veneta replica handbags|Burberry replica handbags|Cartier replica handbags|Celine replica handbags|Christian Dior replica handbags|Christian Dior bag|Coach replica handbags|Coach bagsreplica BreitlingReplica Breitling watchesladies breitling watchesbreitling seawolfbreitling BlackBirdbreitling Superoceanbreitling bentley watchbreitling bentley GTbreitling Montbrillantbreitling NavitimerIWC watcheReplica IWC watchesIWC PilotIWC InGenieurreplica iwc portugueseroyal oak watchesAudemars Piguet watchesAudemars Piguet Replica WatchBaume Mercier WatchesBell ross watchesBvlgari watchesBvlgari watches replicareplica jaeger le coultre watchesjaeger le coultre watchesReplica Cartier watchesCartier watchcartier tank francaise watchcartier tank watchchanel J12 watch
ugg sale
Ugg Boots Sale-Famous top quality Uggs with great discount are On Sale
We are the best Ugg Sale online store.The newest stylish of high quality Uggs& Ugg Boots are On Sale now.Come on,rush to buy your favorite Boots now!
Bailey Button UGG boots ,
UGG Nightfall boots,
cardy ugg boots,
Classic tall boots,
UGG Bailey Button boots.
I hear they're talking about Illinois now....
...for the new Gitmo. Isn't there an empty lot near the Obama's Chicago home? Then we'd see who's scared!
Any of you brave editorial board members been to Gitmo? I'm guessing not. You can visit vicariously here.
Personally, I'm a lot happier with a few miles of ocean and a few states between me and the terrorists instead of just the city of Leavenworth. But that's just me!
And the trial in New York is sheer idiocy!
Juanell_Garrett You are So Right!
You go guy! Don't these stupid liberals realize that the terrorists want us to respect their power? If we treat them like common criminals and not like the powerful terrorists they are it may anger them. We cannot afford to disrespect them... there are over 200 of them down in Gitmo. They could pretty much destroy the country if we bring them here.
Wake up liberals. There are TWO HUNDRED of them. We are doomed if they get inside our borders. What we need are strong leaders who have a healthy respect for the terrorists...
Sarah Palin/Glenn Beck 2012
Do you really want to quote Roosevelt?
Holy mackerel, do you really want to quote FDR to make your point? Isn’t he the same FDR who rounded up Japanese American citizens and put them into internment camps? These were American citizens living in this country, most of them guilty of nothing yet there they were, men, women and children imprisoned with no trial.
Take a breath from defending our incompetent president to research the internment camps. Gitmo is like Atlantis Resort compared to those camps. Please at least TRY to look past your far left ideology and see a bit of reason for a change.
Ross Balano Midwest Voices 2008
What a Bunch of Chickens!
In 1993, civilians representing no country in the world attacked American civilians on American (civilian) soil. In 1996, Ramzi Yousef was convicted in Federal District Court of committing that crime. In 2001, a different group of civilians representing no country in the world also attacked American civilians at the same place. The system has been directly proven to work, and circumstances have not changed. Terrorism is a crime and should be tried accordingly. Calling 9/11 an "act of war" gives it dignity it does not deserve.
The terrorists truly have succeeded in their aims. They've goaded us into two wars that took thousands of lives and bankrupted the country. Based on a whopping two (2) incidents, they've forced us to give up our civil liberties (Patriot Act) and led us to commit un-American atrocities like Abu Ghraib. Now they've got you so scared that you don't even trust your own legal system. I feel sorry for you, having to live your lives in such a constant state of fear.
If you're so brave
The terrorists truly have succeeded in their aims. They've goaded us into two wars that took thousands of lives and bankrupted the country. Based on a whopping two (2) incidents, they've forced us to give up our civil liberties (Patriot Act) and led us to commit un-American atrocities like Abu Ghraib. Now they've got you so scared that you don't even trust your own legal system. I feel sorry for you, having to live your lives in such a constant state of fear.
Why do you post here anonymously, "faceless."
Easy faceless...
I would not categorize Abu Ghraib as an atrocity. Yes, cutting off a person's head while they are alive is one and tossing a living human being into a shredder is one, but scaring someone with a dog, I think not....
less then 12 months of this insanity, less then 36 months of Jimmy II
Kcgrh - or the Philippines death march.
Abu Ghraib was a country club compared to atrocities carried out on our soldiers in the South Pacific or in Vietnam.
We have nothing to prove to the world, Matt
I, like many others, believe that the overwhelming body of evidence viewed through most any imaginably fair lens reveals the USA as the fairest and most transparent country/government in "world leader" recorded history.
In spite of Obama's insulting world apology tour, we owe the world absolutely nothing regarding the terrorists held at Guantanamo.
We do owe ourselves, a decidedly more divided US citizenry today than we were 8 years ago, a timeworn, traditional prompt military tribunal followed by a swift and efficient execution of whatever sentence their guilty verdict mandates.
Obama has chosen to grant a pridefully guilty KSM his well publicized dream scenario: a cadre of lawyers defending him in a public trial in NYC.
The very decision to to do so is inspiring to AlQaeda. It is a propoganda dream for our enemies. That potential alone should be enough to solve the problem another way.
We have enabled freedoms and liberties for tens of millions of people all around the world .....the world knows it ....so do you.
No constitutional rights exist here.......except ours.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
These are terrorists.
These are terrorists, they are not car theives, burglers, rapists, or even ordinary murderers. They are not US citizens or even legal US residents. They are enemy combatants, captured by the military, on foreign soil. They are not entitled to the rights of the Geneva Convention as prisioners of war as they are not part of an official, uniformed army of a country, and they are not in any way entitiled to the rights granted by the US constitution.
This will cost the US taxpayers BILLIONS. Each and every one of these terrorists admitted they are guilty and asked to be executed. THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN WHAT THEY ASKED FOR.
I can pretty much guarntee that they will end up getting off on some sort of legal loophole, like say they were not mirandized on the battlefield. Obama is betting on it, and so is Holder. Anybody that thinks that Obama didn't personally plan and authorize this they are delusional.
This is nothing more than Obama wanting to put the Bush administration on public trial and a secondary purpose of further trashing the CIA. If they are to be tried it should be by military tribunal at Gitmo, and then quickly executed.
This has to be the most ignorant thing ever written .
Only the "RED STAR" would think Terrorist should be given access to our courts , they are not citizens and should not be given the same rights as a U.S. Citizen would . This is a Travisty bye the Obama Admin. who is giving a slap in the face too all who died in 9/11 .
Just a few questions, points, etc. Mat.
1. If terrorists attack NYC during this show trial and there is loss of life, who will be to blame?
2. If this trial is conducted under standard rules of evidence, these "defendants" have not been mirandized. So if they are convicted, does that mean that Miranda no longer holds? Can us citizens now be convicted without Miranda rights?
3. Does it now require our troops to mirandize every terrorist they capture?
4. Why is it OK to try the UUS Cole bombers by tribunal and not the mastermind of 9/11?
5. The prosecutor of the Blind Sheik in '93 has related that by rules of the court he had to release a list of "unindicited co-conspirators" alerting terrorists of who was being watched by us. Could this happen again?
6. President Obama declared on an NBC interview this AM that KSM would be found guilty and sentenced to death. How does this in any way establish "that are returning to the rule of law and proving ourselves to be a beacon of freedom"? (your words sir) Doesn't this statement and those of Mr. Holder of like nature prove that these will indeed just be "show trials"?
This is purely playing politics on the part of Obama and Holder. It is a pathetic little stunt that will give them the opportunity to second guess Pres. Bush his prosecution of the War on Terror; and it may well backfire right in the face of their arrogance.