By Barb Shelly, Kansas City Star editorial page columnist
I don't see why John Boehner is accusing Eric Holder of exercising political motives with his decision to move the trial of Khalid Sheik Mohammed and four co-defendants to federal court in New York City. Given Republicans' skill in whipping up peoples' fears, the attorney general's decision is bound to be hugely unpopular.
But really, where better to bring the self-proclaimed 9/11 mastermind to justice than in the U.S. courts? Let the justice system and the citizens of the nation he so despises determine his fate.
Follow Barb Shelly on Twitter.
Delicious
Digg
اغاني جديدة
اغاني جديدة |
اغاني خليجية |
اغاني |
اغاني سعودية |
اغاني كويتية mp3
اغاني اماراتية |
اغاني لبنانية |
اغاني مصرية |
اغاني شامية |
اغاني سورية |
اغاني عراقية |
اغاني مغربية |
اغاني عربية |
اغاني يمنية |
البومات جديدة |
اغاني MP3 |
طرب |
اغاني اجنبية |
اغاني جلسات |
اغاني شعبية |
اغاني ريمكسات |
تحميل اغاني mp3 |
اغاني طربيه |
احدث الالبومات |
احدث الالبومات الخليجية |
احدث الالبومات المصرية |
اخر الالبومات |
جديد الالبومات |
جديد الاغاني |
جديد الاغاني |
تحميل اغاني |اغاني جديده | خريطة الموقع |
اغاني طربية |
االبومات mp3 |
احدث الالبومات العربيةمنتديات السيف اون لاين ,السيف , اون لاين ,منتديات , دليل , دليل مواقع , ارشف موقعك , خريطة الموقع , الفديو والصوتيات و مقاطع اليوتيوب youtube , منتدى التصاميم والجرافيك , قسم الفيديو والتسجيلات الاسلاميه , قسـم الصـور والتصوير الفوتوغرافي , دروس سبيسات msn spaces , منتدى الشباب العربي , الديكور واكسسورات المنزل , حديث الاسبوع , منتدى الطفل المميز , منتدى الأكلات الشهيه , أكلات الرجيم , قسم الاطباق الرئيسية , قسم الحلويات , قسم المعجنات , قسم السلطات و المقبلات و الخضروات , قسم المشروبات , منتدى الرياضه , قسم الفيديوهات الرياضية , منتدى الكمبيوتر والانترنت العام , الجوالات و الاتصالات والمسجات وتطبيقات الجيل الثالث , السويتش ماكس SwishMax , مدرسه الفوتوشوب , منتدى السيارات , مواقع ومنتديات إسلامية , مواقع الـعلماء والدعاة , منتديات خليجيه وعربيه , مواقع الرحلات البرية , مواقع الثقافة والأدب والعلوم , مواقع الأدب والشعر , مواقع التسلية والترفيه , مواقع الطب والعلاج , مواقع التوظيف والعمل , مواقع التجارة والأسواق , مواقع السياحه والسفر , مواقع الصحف والمجلات , الصحف السعودية , الصحف الكويتية , الصحف الإماراتية , الصحف القطريه , إخبارية ووكالات الأنباء , مواقع قبائل وأنساب عربية , البريد الالكتروني العربية , البريد الالكتروني الانجليزية , مواقع المجموعات البريدية , مواقع تخص الرياضة , اللاعبين ومشاهير الرياضة , مواقع أندية عربية وعالمية , مواقع الكمبيوتر والبرامج , مواقع الدروس والتعليم , الصور والتصاميم الجاهزة , مواقع تقديم خدمة الأنترنت , مواقع التصميم والاستضافة , اسكربتات وبرامج المواقع , سباقات المواقع , مواقع الأدله والبحث , مواقع البنوك والمصارف , الخدمات العامة ومراكز التحميل , مواقع الدردشات , مواقع الدردشة الكتابية , مواقع الدردشة الصوتية, معرض سبيسات msn spaces , منتدى الألعاب الالكترونيه وأجهزة Playstation 3 و Xbox360 , تطوير الذات - تنمية القدرات - تنمية العقل---مطبخ الخليج دردشة شات الخليج منتديات الخليج دليل الخليج شات الخليج شات الخليج الكتابي منتديات الخليج مركز تحميل عينين كويتيات 666 منتديات كويتيات 666 كويتيات 777 عينين دردشة الخليج
feckless are
you completely brain dead, wait I think you already answered that. From your copying of the original post:
"1) Insulting to each and every American citizen."
Where does it say every American thinks this is so? I believe it is a statement of an opinion not a lib mind reading post. If someone says that burning the American flag is a insult to all Americans, are they also wrong?
You have been quite entertaining, this is the picture of the left we all need to remember in 2010 and 2012.
Feckless - can you think of anyone who might
want to extend our Constitutional rights to foreign Islamic terrorists? Do you? Oh, I forgot, Obama & Holder think it wise. Actually, their motives are my biggest concern. Are they really motivated in extending our Const. rights, or are they looking to use the terrorist's defense to punish Bush administration?
.
I think Chazzykc was making an assumption. And I can't imagine his assumption being wrong, but maybe you can.
Nice smokescreen, Woody.
But you still didn't answer the question.
1) Insulting to each and every American citizen.
How does chazzykc know that? Did he ask each and every one?
How do you know it's insulting to every American, Woody? Did you ask, or are you mindreading?
feckless your pathetic
posts shows why your question was inane. The reason why it is insulting to every American is you are granting the rights have been fought for and protected to people who hate the very nature of the rights. These are foreigners who attacked our country and killed our citizens who deserve the protection of the Constitution.
Based on the logic that these lowlifes are covered under the Constitution then who would not be covered? Please define the limitations if any of our system of govt and laws covering others. Do they apply in canada, mexico, cuba, europe? Is it only when you think it is so? And let's use another stupid question to expose yours:
Can you provide proof that he is wrong?
Also please provide proof that these individuals want to be covered by US law.
I disagree with the reaction to these individuals actions also, there are far to many afghanis still alive. Also it is time to destroy the poppy fields entirely and then offer help. If they don't want it then leave them on their own.
Also let's save money, close all our military bases outside the US a create new ones on both of our boarders. Get the dual benefit of greater security and live fire exercises protecting the USA. Not to mention the economic impact of the jobs that go along with military bases. It would be beautiful to watch the economic impact in europe.
Gee, Woody
You constantly decry lib posts that drip with hate, yet you've just posted an ad hominem attack ("lib liar and dimwit"). Could it be that I've exposed chazzykc's faulty logic and you don't like it? Is that why it's an inane question?
Read chazzy's post again, Woody. He says it's "Doubly insulting to all the loved ones of the 9/11 victims who will now be unneccessarily exposed for months to a "simpsonesque", parade of folly."
"All" does not equal "almost all" (Besides, you can't believe everything you read in the MSM now, can ya, Woody?)
I'll give you credit for partially answering part of the question, Woody, but I noticed you still didn't touch this part of it:
1) Insulting to each and every American citizen.
How does chazzy know this? Did he ask each and every US citizen? If not, then he's mindreading - something else you abhor, Woody.
feekless shows
his lib roots with an inane question to distract from the point. Is the writer projecting a bit in their applying of an opinion they have to others, yes. Can anyone but a lib liar or dimwit figure this out, yes.
As for the opinion of 9/11 survivors, the nyt contacted many of them to ask, they almost all felt that giving the rights of the Constitution to terrorists did diminish what it means to be an American.
What explanation?
Where did I say it's better to try them in a civilian court in NY than a military tribunal? I'm not a lawyer and I don't opine about things that I don't know.
So, back to the question I asked:
1) Insulting to each and every American citizen.
2) Doubly insulting to all the loved ones of the 9/11 victims who will now be unneccessarily exposed for months to a "simpsonesque", parade of folly.
How does chazzy know this? Did he ask everyone?
So Feckless - please explain
why it's better to try them in civilian court in NY than a military tribunal. Just want to know.
Solutions
The granting of constitutional rights to these murderous terrorists is:
1) Insulting to each and every American citizen.
2) Doubly insulting to all the loved ones of the 9/11 victims who will now be unneccessarily exposed for months to a "simpsonesque", parade of folly.
How do you know? Did you ask all 300 million of us? Did you ask all the friends and relatives of the 9/11 victims?
Riiiiiiight! Barb's post is a political screed but your response is not. Good to know.