By Arturo Mora, Kansas City Star Midwest Voices columnist
The global warming debate has become an ideological battle of dueling facts and Web sites. Lost in all the noise is the real reason to care about the environment.
Whether you believe global warming is real or not, what matters most is handing off a better world to our children.
We Americans don’t like being preached to. What I drive is my business. What I eat is mine to decide, and so on. At heart we’re a libertarian nation when it comes to personal choices.
That attitude is helping create deeper skepticism about global warming. According to a Pew Research Center poll, only 57 percent of respondents now think there’s solid evidence of global warming, down from a high of 77 percent, and only 36 percent agree human activity is behind any temperature change.
Opponents of climate change legislation have been successful with media campaigns that use a lot of dubious science to supposedly debunk real science. For example, one of their talking points is that there is no scientific consensus about global warming. In reality, 97 percent of climatologists — real scientists, with peer-reviewed published papers, not someone running a Web site — agree that human activity is changing our planet’s climate for the worse. Our own National Academy of Science, along with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, agrees with this scientific consensus.
Yet the “debate” continues. A popular book, “SuperFreakonomics,” helped spout a theory that temperatures have actually cooled in the last 10 years. The science behind this claim is to compare 1998, one of the hottest years on record, with subsequent years. Back to real science: The National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration debunked the new theory, pointing out 1998 was an anomaly.
Another popular theory, that it’s all part of normal temperature change over thousands of years, has also been debunked by real scientists at NASA, who have shown the current trend is outside the normal cycles. That real trend, in the last 10 years and 30 years, continues to be temperatures rising, arctic ice melting, polar bears dying.
I’m a firm believer in this real science and the need for concrete action. I understand the urge to say “leave me alone.” But no one lives in a bubble, except that big bubble called Earth. Our choices affect others. It’s a matter of personal responsibility because there’s a social cost attached to everything we buy and do. That social cost includes the energy consumed, the effect on global warming and the pollution caused by what we use.
Why not let the free market solve the problem? Because the free market doesn’t take social costs into account. It needs some help there. This is nothing new. Our whole history has been about making reasonable adjustments to free market forces. We leaven raw capitalism with our humanity. It’s why the elderly aren’t left to fend for themselves and why very few starve in this country.
Cap-and-trade systems allow everyone to help pay for their choices by building in a social-cost price tag. If there are legitimate reasons for certain uses, there can be tax credits. It’s the responsible and patriotic thing to do, to think beyond yourself and accept your impact on the world.
There are tough issues to be debated. What can our economy handle? Will there be a negative or positive effect on jobs? Who should pay what? The harder choices are the personal ones. No one likes to be told what to do, what to buy or what to eat.
It should be your choice. But if it’s no big skin off your nose, why not choose to hand off a better planet to your children? Why not use that reusable bag, skip beef once a week, change that shower head, use those funny light bulbs? The next time you go to buy a car, why not take a good look at the gas mileage?
Don’t do it because Al Gore or some environmentalist told you to. Do it because it’s right for your kids.
Arturo Mora of Overland Park has worked in printing, publishing, advertising and marketing. To reach Midwest Voices columnists, write to the author c/o the Editorial Page, The Kansas City Star, 1729 Grand Blvd., Kansas City, MO 64108. Or send e-mail to .









Delicious
Digg
اغاني جديدة
اغاني جديدة |
اغاني خليجية |
اغاني |
اغاني سعودية |
اغاني كويتية mp3
اغاني اماراتية |
اغاني لبنانية |
اغاني مصرية |
اغاني شامية |
اغاني سورية |
اغاني عراقية |
اغاني مغربية |
اغاني عربية |
اغاني يمنية |
البومات جديدة |
اغاني MP3 |
طرب |
اغاني اجنبية |
اغاني جلسات |
اغاني شعبية |
اغاني ريمكسات |
تحميل اغاني mp3 |
اغاني طربيه |
احدث الالبومات |
احدث الالبومات الخليجية |
احدث الالبومات المصرية |
اخر الالبومات |
جديد الالبومات |
جديد الاغاني |
جديد الاغاني |
تحميل اغاني |اغاني جديده | خريطة الموقع |
اغاني طربية |
االبومات mp3 |
احدث الالبومات العربيةمنتديات السيف اون لاين ,السيف , اون لاين ,منتديات , دليل , دليل مواقع , ارشف موقعك , خريطة الموقع , الفديو والصوتيات و مقاطع اليوتيوب youtube , منتدى التصاميم والجرافيك , قسم الفيديو والتسجيلات الاسلاميه , قسـم الصـور والتصوير الفوتوغرافي , دروس سبيسات msn spaces , منتدى الشباب العربي , الديكور واكسسورات المنزل , حديث الاسبوع , منتدى الطفل المميز , منتدى الأكلات الشهيه , أكلات الرجيم , قسم الاطباق الرئيسية , قسم الحلويات , قسم المعجنات , قسم السلطات و المقبلات و الخضروات , قسم المشروبات , منتدى الرياضه , قسم الفيديوهات الرياضية , منتدى الكمبيوتر والانترنت العام , الجوالات و الاتصالات والمسجات وتطبيقات الجيل الثالث , السويتش ماكس SwishMax , مدرسه الفوتوشوب , منتدى السيارات , مواقع ومنتديات إسلامية , مواقع الـعلماء والدعاة , منتديات خليجيه وعربيه , مواقع الرحلات البرية , مواقع الثقافة والأدب والعلوم , مواقع الأدب والشعر , مواقع التسلية والترفيه , مواقع الطب والعلاج , مواقع التوظيف والعمل , مواقع التجارة والأسواق , مواقع السياحه والسفر , مواقع الصحف والمجلات , الصحف السعودية , الصحف الكويتية , الصحف الإماراتية , الصحف القطريه , إخبارية ووكالات الأنباء , مواقع قبائل وأنساب عربية , البريد الالكتروني العربية , البريد الالكتروني الانجليزية , مواقع المجموعات البريدية , مواقع تخص الرياضة , اللاعبين ومشاهير الرياضة , مواقع أندية عربية وعالمية , مواقع الكمبيوتر والبرامج , مواقع الدروس والتعليم , الصور والتصاميم الجاهزة , مواقع تقديم خدمة الأنترنت , مواقع التصميم والاستضافة , اسكربتات وبرامج المواقع , سباقات المواقع , مواقع الأدله والبحث , مواقع البنوك والمصارف , الخدمات العامة ومراكز التحميل , مواقع الدردشات , مواقع الدردشة الكتابية , مواقع الدردشة الصوتية, معرض سبيسات msn spaces , منتدى الألعاب الالكترونيه وأجهزة Playstation 3 و Xbox360 , تطوير الذات - تنمية القدرات - تنمية العقل---مطبخ الخليج دردشة شات الخليج منتديات الخليج دليل الخليج شات الخليج شات الخليج الكتابي منتديات الخليج مركز تحميل عينين كويتيات 666 منتديات كويتيات 666 كويتيات 777 عينين دردشة الخليج
http://www.shopstyleonline.co.uk
Ed Hardy women underwear
nfl new york giants
ed hardy women underwear
ny giants team members
ed hardy Belts
New York Jets Jerseys
This about explains it all. If you really believe in GW
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/09/mcintyre-and-lindzen-to-appear-on-finnish-tv-documentary-transcript/
and more
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100011716/how-the-global-warming-industry-is-based-on-one-massive-lie/
You can have all of your so called climate experts, I'll take this guy, one of the foremost experts in the world and who other supposed experts refuse to debate.
http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=3771
http://www.dailytech.com/NASA+Study+Acknowledges+Solar+Cycle+Not+Man+Responsible+for+Past+Warming/article15310.htm
http://joannenova.com.au/2009/07/climate-money/
http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/09/22/obama-speech-to-the-un-the-data/
http://www.tulsabeacon.com/?p=462
http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm
Arturo is full of it
Stick to publishing or whatever you do. You are an idiot and a lemming.
"For example, one of their talking points is that there is no scientific consensus about global warming. In reality, 97 percent of climatologists — real scientists, with peer-reviewed published papers, not someone running a Web site — agree that human activity is changing our planet’s climate for the worse."
Complete BS. Do a little research, don't just listen to people you agree with.
http://antigreen.blogspot.com/2009/11/no-consensus-about-anthropogenic-global.html
The tide is changing and Obama is going to try to push this BS through also.
Basing policy on theory with no proof beyond computer simulations is stupid. And anyone who proposes doing so is an idiot.
There are a billion people on the planet without clean water. You want to spend money, spend it on them, not a hypothesis.
http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/09/leading-uk-climate-scientists-must-explain-or-resign/
The AGW movement is founded on lies.
Your view of history is a bit infantile
There are 2 presidential parties. Pretending otherwise is a wasted vote, might as well try to pay for groceries with zlotys.
It might work in some countries - not here.
`K, Show me the money - - what Republican initiative in the last 5 years has been for the common good/welfare of the US and her citizenry and not that of big business ?
Intrigueing responses.....no acknowledgement that your earlier presumptions were wrong....only criticism of your (again incorrect) presumption of where I chose to cast my vote in past elections.
Your limitation of "history" to the most recent five years is, to me, reflective of either shallow, narrow thinking or someone who has no actual knowledge of history.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
shawn
how about medicare/medicaid expansion and NCLB? Name the dem ideas that did something other than help big business, the stimulas sure was focused on the rich. Impresive the size of the blinders you seem to be wearing.
And just for the record, I opposed both of those Bush plans. They may have been more than 5 years ago, I figured I would just leave out lowering taxes and keeping us safe.
global warming
Don't want to do anything about this - great. You vote "R" and historically Rs don't really care about anyone below their place in life.
You're not really any different.
I have voted in 11 presidential elections and pulled the R lever 3 times(though I certainly wish it had been 4).
It might work in some countries - not here.
Your postulatiion that all republicans care little or nothing about those below "their place in life" is a laughable, stereotypical castigation that fits the extremist progressive template.
One of the these days even
One of the these days even the mainstream media will figure out it was "Gored"
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/13/technology/13gore.html
Wrong assumption/conclusions....dr_shawn
Don't want to do anything about this - great. You vote "R" and historically Rs don't really care about anyone below their place in life.
You're not really any different.
I have voted in 11 presidential elections and pulled the R lever 3 times(though I certainly wish it had been 4).
I appreciate your links and found your polar bear article meaningful and informative....the underlying cause of the increase puts the issue in a different light than I had considered previously....the other 2 links were of little or no value in my view. I am not religious in a traditional sense.... though I do consider myself very spiritual.
Your postulatiion that all republicans care little or nothing about those below "their place in life" is a laughable, stereotypical castigation that fits the extremist progressive template.
As a confirmed libertarian for over 2 decades I am a passionate believer that we all are equal with a uniquely American opportunity to accomplish whatever realistic goals we are willing to dilligently work for and aspire to....as long as the fed stays out of the way. I COMPLETELY REJECT the democrat inspired, "victimhood" based, philosophy of wealth redistribution and nanny stateism.
The only "place in life" that any of us is burdened with is the one in this moment....right now ......tomorrow each of us has the opportunity to change it.
If you find individual rights, freedoms and opportunities of minimal societal value then continue supportinng those like Obama who share that perspective ....I may passioantely disagree with you but I wholly respect your right to be wrong........but do not expect me to give up my rights or those of my children and grandchild without a fight.
I will not embrace the granting of unwarrented, unearned rights and priviliges to others who do not play the same game by the same rules.
So I guess I am different....as we all are.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.