By Larry Marsh, Kansas City Star Midwest Voices columnist
Elinor Ostrom of Indiana University in Bloomington and Oliver Williamson from the University of California at Berkeley won the Nobel Prize in Economics for their work on economic governance and the organization of cooperation.
The problem of managing common property is an important problem in economics. In some cases if common property is poorly managed it can be over-exploited as a common property resource. Over-fishing or pollution of lakes and streams can be caused by poor common property management. This problem is referred to as the tragedy of the commons.
At the other extreme common property can be unexploited or underexploited as explained by Michael Heller in his book "The Gridlock Economy." Heller notes that joint ownership can make negotiating a contract almost impossible when each member has veto power. Ostrom's research explains how common property can be managed effectively.
Ostrom's contribution is explained in detail in her 1990 book "Governing the Commons." She noted that earlier work by economists offered three dominant models of collective behavior which are (1.) the tragedy of the commons, (2.) the prisoners's dilemma, and (3.) the logic of collective action. These earlier models of collective behavior assume a free rider problem where there is no trust and everyone is out for themselves. A free rider is someone who takes the benefits from common ownership without paying his or her fair share of the costs. Ostrom's work shows what happens when participants do not act as free riders but instead trust one another and cooperate to achieve a better outcome for all.
Williamson's research has included work on the difference between the way markets perform when participants act as anonymous actors versus when personal relationships are formed between producers and their suppliers. Transaction costs can be quite different depending upon how market participants relate to one another. At one extreme market participants can be entirely unrelated dealing only in arm's length transactions. At the other extreme transactions can take place entirely within a firm which can substantially alter transaction costs. Again, as with Ostrom's work, Williamson research examines the role of trust and cooperation in forming and maintaining relationships.
The problems of economic governance and managing common property play are important issues in economics. Ostrom and Williamson certainly deserve the Nobel prize for their insightful contributions to dealing with the role of trust and personal relationships in economics.
. . .
Also see:
Bernanke's KC talk points to deeper problem in business, economic analysis
Enhance financial security, cut income tax with tax-deferred savings plan
Deprive petro-dictators of oil money with a price floor on crude oil imports
. . .
For recent Larry Marsh commentary search Google News for: "Larry Marsh Kansas City Star".









Delicious
Digg
Hot off the Press...
This just in!!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Obama watches a college football game and wins the Heisman Trophy !!!
mmm, mmmm, mmm, how we do love the big 0, the messiah....
More validation of the committee's frivolity
As was suggested Friday, each of the disciplines receiving Alfred Nobel's cherished prizes is awarded for actual, tangible accomplishments.....that is, each excluding the Peace Prize.
The Peace Prize has been frivolously awarded repeatedly since Le Duc Tho refused his in 1973 for having accomplished nothing beyond meeting with Kissinger.
While well intentioned, the committee, it is worth noting, is the exclusive province of the 118th largest country in the world whose decidedly progressive cultural base is reflective of a population one million fewer than the state of Missouri.
The Peace Prize being awarded to Obama is the "feel good", politically correct equivalent to the idiocy of awarding trophies to "all who participate" in a team environment in which nothing tangible has been achieved. It says nothing....and assigns praise for wishes.
"Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
The Nobel Prizes
The Nobel committee nominations a are made and awards made for work done in fields before the nomination. Sometimes the work looks promising for change in the future. I'm sure the committee realizes that their are those who do not or will never agree with their choice.
This prestigious international award is their way of saying, "Up Yours!", to those who don't agree.
To those who get the Nobel Prize award, May You Grow Old and Prosper, in your field, And Peace Be With You.
This is a Crock...
the big 0, the messiah, has shown his superior understanding of America's economy by his porkulous bill.
I think Palin is behind this as well as a right-wing conspricay led by racists.
Have I covered all the bases louie????
BudRog - basketball is his game, but
the Heisman committee might want to consider him because he watches football on TV.
Any word yet
on how he is doing for the Heisman?
Not true Obama won because he is awsome !!!
Hes just so cool he won . He won because of his coolness .
Too bad.
I really thought Obama had this one in the bag. I mean what kind of speeches do these two amateurs make?