By The Kansas City Star Editorial Board
If dreaming up future ideas for this piece of the page sounds good, consider this offer.
Twice a month, the editorial board is joined by six reader advisers to brainstorm future editorials. If opinions on local, national and international topics are your passion, and you are able to escape your workplace for two hours a month, you may be just the person for this volunteer post.
Apply to join the fifth annual Editorial Board reader advisory panel. The post comes with added opportunities: We hope every panelist will augment the twice monthly meetings by frequently contributing individual opinions to the Midwest Voices blog, voices.kansascity.com.
We seek individuals from varied backgrounds, with opinions that differ from our own and expertise in fields outside journalism. The goal is simple: These pages benefit from more minds/insights/opinions around the table.
To apply, send us a brief bio with your home and work address, describe your political persuasion, list five editorial ideas (summaries only) you’d like to see in print and email it to , with Reader Adviser Applicant in the subject line.
Or send applications by mail to Editorial Page, The Kansas City Star, 1729 Grand Blvd., Kansas City, MO. 64108. (To bring new voices to the table, we decline to consider elected or appointed public officials or relatives of Star employees.)
Deadline for applicants is July 22. We’ll announce the new panel in August. Spread the word.









Delicious
Digg
flop and apop...
you guys are back in elementary if you are defending flop's lack of an answer to a simple question that you global warming, oops, did it again, CLIMATE CHANGE, libs should have a ready answer. You obviously don't have the balls to say, yes, our plan is unworkable because there is not an "acceptable" lib option to coal. So, we little libs will just try and pass the bill, ruin the remaining American manufacturing, then bitch that companies are moving from America.
You both lack the courage to say what we all know. Twas merely asked flop to admit it, and flop, being a good little lib, will not.
Most disengenuous of you flop... be a man!!
I was thinking 4th, myself
Oh well.
Talking?
Is posting on an anonymous discussion board the same thing as "talking"?
I find it quite comical
That was odd. I was responding to chazzy and you pipe up to declare that you're "done talking to me."
Is chazzykc another one of your alter egos? Just how many do you have?
Don't worry -- I won't make you answer. ;-)
He announces he is done talking to you by talking to you.
It's like being in 6th grade again.
twas
That was odd. I was responding to chazzy and you pipe up to declare that you're "done talking to me."
Is chazzykc another one of your alter egos? Just how many do you have?
Don't worry -- I won't make you answer. ;-)
That's their problem.
"No one can make you feel inferior without your permission." --Eleanor Roosevelt
I don't take being called a liberal as an insult--I'm proud to be called that. But not being an Obama follower, I'm not allowed in the club anymore. I wouldn't want to be lumped in with "the left" these days anyway. Never would I have thought t-shirts with "bros before hos" or "Palin is a c**t" would be acceptable from a group that at one time stood for civil and women's rights.
Reading Barb's post on Bob McNamara takes me back to a time where being liberal stood for a lot more than it does today.
Interface - I'm done talking to you
until you answer my question. You keep acting like you have - and you haven't.
.
You wouldn't let me get away with the same thing, so I'll just wait.
not at all
Even I understand that is a distorting statement.
Nope. No distortion in the statement that the strong majority in our country do not identify themselves as conservative.
Labels are Meaningless
Liberals MUST be the majority because anyone who disagrees with any conservative point in this blog is automatically labeled as a left wing liberal.
Reality is that there are degrees of everything. If I was answering a poll, I'd identify myself as "conservative" based on desire for balanced budget amendment, support for 2nd Amendment rights, opposition to expansion of welfare programs, and keeping international borders closed. Also based on support for individual liberties (as in women's right to choose what to do with their own bodies) and support for the institution of marriage (by allowing gays to marry). You don't like the way I characterize myself -- too bad.
The vast majority of Americans support a wide range of positions, some "liberal" and some "conservative." However, since the term "liberal" is routinely used in these blogs as an insult, it's hardly surprising that most people taking moderate positions would avoid identifying themselves as "liberals".
In what sense does that change the meaning?
Unless you're contending that liberals should be lumped with conservatives. Had he said that America was primarily moderate and liberal, are you saying that would be a WEAKER statement than saying "moderate"?
Incidentally, the "shallow majority" elected the current President, by a considerably larger margin than that enjoyed by his predecessor.