By Yael T. Abouhalkah, Kansas City Star Editorial Page columnist
As I was reminded once again today, Mayor Kay Barnes had the chance to lead on a key health issue five years ago. But she failed, which slowed progress on smoke-free initiatives for several years in the area's largest city.
Back in 2004, Barnes and a City Council majority kowtowed to the restaurant and bar industries when it came time to consider new smoking rules.
Remember the ridiculous 85 percent measure?
The council passed an ordinance that banned smoking in bars and restaurants -- but only after 85 percent of the metropolitan area's population lived in cities with similar bans.
It was an unattainable goal, especially given the fact that neither Kansas nor Missouri has approved any kind of smoke-free bill yet (another major disappointment). So that meant city after city after city had to pass basically the exact same language as KC had to make the KC law go into effect.
Fortunately, petitioners in Kansas City eventually succeeded in putting a truly tough ban on the ballot, and voters approved it in 2008.
By then, however, KC had fallen behind Overland Park, Olathe, Independence, Lee's Summit and other cities that had passed strict laws since 2004 -- although not enough to reach the 85 percent level.
This week I have been working on an editorial pointing out that Raytown is now the largest area city without a smoke-free law. Today, a supporter of the anti-smoking movement reminded me of all the problems caused by KC's lack of leadership on this issue earlier in the decade.
True, and that lack of leadership remains a black mark on the Barnes administration.







Delicious
Digg
before someone writes that private busybodies and the voters did
this not government, I know. Did one of them stand up for the rights of the private business owner? I saw several out front fighting for taking their rights away and so I think the majority supported not supporting private business.
So, the people we depend on to support our rights failed us in this case.
kcgrh, we are losing business
They better get the message, people will resist government control. It is in our blood to fight for free will. The managers of the establishments I mentioned used some colorful language to refer to KC Government and one took it a step further and moved. I would rather the other two move than go out of business.
kclifetimer...
You don't get it. The lib fascists know better then you do how to protect you and yours, and they will do it. Oh, a few PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS suffer, well, that's just collateral damage to the lib fascists way...
the big 0, the messiah, may have the govt. takeover their business...
Even a non smoker sees impact
I can tell you that our favorite dining spot has seen a decrease in business because of the ban. I never had a problem with allowing smokers and never had an issue getting a seat in the non smoking section so why is government(and newspapers) butting into this issue that is truly the business of the owner and their customers to work out?
P.S. My second favorite eating and drinking establishment is about out of business and another has moved so this law impacted me, a non smoker, in a negative way. I am capable of protecting my health and that of my families just fine but thanks anyway.
Thank goodness
And let's keep it that way. An island of sanity in a sea of insanity.