By Reggie Marselus, special to the Kansas City Star
In recent weeks, both U.S. senators from Kansas – Pat Roberts and Sam Brownback – have made statements on their views of detainees at Guantanamo, Cuba.
Both have said they will vehemently oppose any attempt to transfer detainees to the federal penitentiary at Leavenworth.
The issue has become a political hot potato with many communities refusing to accept inmates from Guantanamo.
When President Barack Obama took office he ordered Guantanamo closed within a year. Last month, however, the Senate balked, voting to strip $80 million for the closing of the facility.
Roberts and Brownback have a lot of company. Their stated reasons are that the Leavenworth facility is not capable of housing the prisoners. The staff, administration and support people are not trained well enough.
There are no facilities for holding hearings or providing for all the unforeseen difficulties that can arise from having charge of these detainees.
Both senators have, in essence, told the world that Kansas and its detention facilities are not good enough to do the job. Our prison is not secure enough.
Our guards are not experienced enough. Our administration and staff are not qualified enough.
Both senators should reconsider their position.
Having worked at the penitentiary in an electrical construction capacity, I have personally witnessed the more than adequate security of the prison.
The staff, administration, guards and support personnel are all imminently qualified, dedicated and highly trained. Those detainees will be secure.
Kansas should not only welcome the chance to be considered for this momentous responsibility, but we should actually campaign to get the detainees.
Cowering, hiding and shrinking from action because of fear is not the response we should allow the world to see.
This is a golden opportunity to show the world that we are the most secure place on the planet. We have two major U.S. Army bases, Fort Riley and Fort Leavenworth, as well as McConnell Air Force base in Wichita. We are one of the safest states in the entire nation.
And think of the economic boost to the area surrounding Leavenworth, including the Kansas City metropolitan area. The federal government could improve and upgrade everything in and around the penitentiary.
Support services and businesses that supply them will thrive. That means jobs — permanent jobs, and lots of them.
The people of Kansas will be able to boast that when the need arose, we stood up to be counted as part of the razor’s edge in the struggle against those who would kill themselves in order to kill us.
There is no fear here. It would be a feather in our caps and another proud chapter in the legacy and story of our great state.
Reggie Marselus is a retired electrician. He lives in Lenexa.









Delicious
Digg
What the big 0 Used to Say on Miranda...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/06/flashback_obama_said_terrorist_1.asp
I guess this is just more change you can believe in from the messiah.....
Latest on the big 0
the messiah is now reading terrorists Miranda... How stupid is this idiot????
http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/605iidws.asp
17 months until sanity returns....
crazy
working to change our tarnished image back to the global standardbearer for the rule of law and due process? That's nuts!
Interface - what law did they break?
How can we prosecute them in OUR courts when they didn't break any laws here?
prosecution
Civilian terrorism trials are not new to American courtrooms. The list of accused terrorists tried in the United States is long: Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman was accused of plotting to blow up New York landmarks. Zacarias Moussaoui pleaded guilty to conspiring to carry out the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. There was Richard Reid, aka the "shoe bomber." And there are many, many others.
What makes the Ghailani case different is that this detainee has been at Guantanamo Bay for 2 1/2 years.
Susan Hirsch of George Mason University has a personal connection to the case. Her husband was killed in the blast at the embassy in Tanzania.
"For me, justice through a trial is one important response to terrorism," says Hirsch. "Given what we've been through in the last eight years, it's a return to the rule of law and using our legal system to respond to even the worst crimes."
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104406496
another:
The Office of Military Commissions announced today that charges have been sworn against Guantanamo detainee Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Haza al Darbi of Saudi Arabia. The accused, al Darbi, is the brother-in-law of the Flight 77 hijacker al Mihdhar. Flight 77 is the plane that hit the Pentagon on 9/11.
The sworn charges are: Conspiring with others , to attack civilians, to murder in violation of the law of war, to destroy property in violation of the law of war, to hazard a vessel and to commit terrorism, and Providing Material Support to Terrorism. Mr. al Darbi was allegedly involved in planning attacks on a vessels in the Strait of Hormuz and off the coast of Yemen.
http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=11583
Google is cool. All you have to do is type in questions and answers come up.
But Interface
Illegal enemy combatants on the Afghan battlefield - what laws have they broken in or against the U.S., where they can be tried on U.S. soil?
Your use of Google & Wiki is impressive, but you didn't answer the questions asked.
Yes, Crazy
giving terrorists who want to kill American Solders legal rights to which they, as enemy combatants, are not entitled and raising the risk of harm to our troops. Yes, I would categorize that as crazy flop...
But that's right, the messiah probably had a vision... more likely a buzz from sneaking a smoke....
riiiight
not torturing folks and allowing them basic legal rights is "endangering our troops."
Ah, the twisted logic of the right-wingers.
Heh
"We are one of the safest states in the entire nation."
Unless your an unborn baby - doh!
"And think of the economic boost to the area surrounding Leavenworth, including the Kansas City metropolitan area. The federal government could improve and upgrade everything in and around the penitentiary."
Really? How so? Please, enlighten... you say they could, but would they?
Gitmo isn't closed yet?
WTH, WTH?? I mean he promised! (Oops sorry that should be "He" promised)
Crap I thought the terrorists would be in DC by now with ACLU lawyers at arraingments with some getting bail!?
Oh the humanity!!!
You can't make this stuff up folks.
Not Secure Enough?
I don't really care if they move these guys to Leavenworth or not, but don't give me that BS about how it's not secure enough. I don't see too many people of any nationality being "sprung" out of Leavenworth. If their friends do try to spring these guys, a bunch of Arabic-looking men coming to Leavenworth won't exactly escape public notice. If by chance they did pull off a jailbreak, you are talking about Arabic men who mostly don't speak English and are wearing orange jumpsuits. They aren't exactly going to just blend into the population.
Watch Out Faceless...
You are approaching the dreaded "profiling"...
The correct scenario is:
1. Group of Arabs noticed in L
2. Law enforcement does NOTHING
3. Arabs spring "brothers" from prison
4. Brothers create mayhem, rape and kill
5. Brothers are arrested and charged
6. Lib judge releases because they had such a poor "childhood"
7. America continues to suffer with libs...
Campaign?
Campaign to get prisoners? Geesh.
So exactly where in the details does taking in these prisoners translate into an economic boom for Leavenworth or KC? Please link to that fact.
How much different is this issue with "yeah, everyone needs to go to prison, but don't build it in my back yard"?
The Star didn't mention Reggie was a liberal
who writes letters to the Star spewing his liberal agenda. Why would they though, since he's lockstep with the Editorial Board?
twas?
What's liberal about striving to have a process to handle detainees that follows the rule of law?
Oh, yeah -- it's liberal by process of elimination, if nothing else, because the last, so-called "conservative" regime had such contempt for the rule of law.
Hmmm.
Is it your kneejerk reaction to dub every position or writer with whom you disagree a "liberal"?
STFU Interface
I've read Letters for years. I know of Reggie. He's a bleeding-heart liberal. Other Midwest Voices writers (of which Reggie is not) tell us about them and their leanings. I wanted to set the record straight for some "guest columnist" they saw fit to include.
Interface - get a life! There is life outside this blog (where you seem to live).
[chuckle]
I believe one of the other posters already pointed out the absurdity of this criticism coming from you, hon.
No Cigar Reggie....
the big 0 is getting all the support he can handle for these terrorists. Europe has willingly said "bring-em on", so Kansas does not need to put itself at risk by housing them.
Oh, that's right, Europe told the big 0 to stuff-it, didn't they? We are just going to have to talk them some more until they realize the error of their ways.
Less then 17 months of this madness to go...