Kansas City Star Tuesday editorial
One of the great tragedies of the murder of Wichita doctor George Tiller is that it enables public policy to be shaped by a bullet.
This is a horrible notion, and must be rejected by all.
Tiller was known throughout the United States, worldwide even, as one of the few remaining U.S. doctors willing to perform late-term abortions.
How few? Back in 1990, doctors in at least seven clinics would terminate late-term pregnancies. After a rash of abortion-related murders and other violence, the number had dwindled to three, with clinics in Kansas, Colorado and Nebraska.
If no physician steps forward to replace Tiller, there will now be two clinics, both run by aging doctors.
“If you’re a woman who needed the care he provided, there are few options,” said Vicki Saporta, president of the National Abortion Federation. “It’s a devastating loss.”
Criminals and extremists cannot be allowed to shut down a legal medical practice. The federal government must do a better job of enforcing laws and policies put in place to protect abortion providers.
The U.S. Justice Department should revive a task force that was created in 1998, after the murder of Dr. Barnett Slepian. The task force coordinated information on extremist groups, helped train local police agencies and funded clinic safety measures.
Protecting abortion providers faded as a priority during the Bush administration, and the task force went largely dormant. Barack Obama’s justice department should get the effort back on track.
Tiller had survived assassination attempts in 1986 and in 1993. He spent years under guard, and always knew he was at risk.
The physician also fended off repeated legal challenges. But despite repeated investigations, grand jury inquiries and one trial, he was always found to have followed Kansas law.
Tiller’s history of threats, harassment and legal challenges does a lot to explain why his is a lonely profession. But as long as abortion is legal, Tiller told associates, women should be able to have the procedure done safely, even in the late stages of pregnancy.
Late-term abortions provoke the strongest reactions in an arena fraught with emotional debate.
Proponents note the desperate circumstances of women who seek them. The vast majority of Tiller’s patients were carrying fetuses with severe abnormalities, those familiar with the business said.
“It’s heartbreaking,” said Peggy Bowman, one of Tiller’s former employees. “Almost all of these families have set up the nursery. They’re ecstatic about being pregnant and then they get that awful news.”
Opponents note how infant-like a fetus appears as it nears full term.
With little common ground and the debate showing no signs of subsiding, it’s understandable that few physicians are volunteering to enter the field.
But the last thing this country needs in the abortion debate is for a radical with a gun to be able to create de-facto public policy.
After the killing, President Barack Obama said, “However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence.”
That’s absolutely correct. But Obama must do more than talk. His administration must offer more protections for physicians to carry out the legal practice of abortion.









Delicious
Digg
Turn em in
And good luck with that plan since Roeder was reported to the FBI for vandalizing a clinic in KC less than 24 hours before he assassinated Dr. Tiller. Remember how quickly the FBI moved to go after him?
Yeah, me neither.
I was actually kind of surprised they picked up this guy in New Jersey. I guess threatening elected officials is what caught law enforcement's attention?
NO.
So, he incited Connecticut Catholics to "take up arms" and singled out two Connecticut lawmakers and a state ethics official, and you think that is NOT worthy of criminal charges?
Let's use the wingnuts argument and pretend this guy is a Muslim. He has a radio show and he encourages his listeners to take up arms and mentions lawmakers by name. You and I both know he would be arrested (and justifiably so) in a heartbeat.
No. No. No. Like the post below--what about the rappers? How about those that "out" people on the Internet? Do they "incite" people? Let's go all the way back to Judas Priest lyrics and Tipper Gore wanting warning labels on records? When does this sh!t stop?
Again. What the eff do liberals stand for anymore?
I Think We Have a Bingo..
You win today's first game darroby85...
Liberals have ALWAYS
Considered freedom of speech to be theirs and theirs alone.
Generally they think that the first ammendment reads: Should any liberal dislike or disagree with ANYTHING that anyone who is not liberal says, the non-liberal must be silenced. Liberals may, of course, say anything they like regardless of truth, vileness of content, or outright slander and defamation of character, there must be no disagreement with said speech, and there shall be no consequences as a result of such speech.
This is how people like APOP, Interpuck, Hendircks, and others justify making vile comments about entire groups of people, with whom they disagree. Comments that are false, full of hatred for entire groups of people, and outright slanderous.
So When Do We Start on the Rappers apop
these people sing violence against the hos, what's your fascist difference?????
Encouraging people to take up arms is free speech?
Not in my constitution it isn't.
Wow
Is this what liberals stand for now?
Good grief.
So, he incited Connecticut Catholics to "take up arms" and singled out two Connecticut lawmakers and a state ethics official, and you think that is NOT worthy of criminal charges?
Let's use the wingnuts argument and pretend this guy is a Muslim. He has a radio show and he encourages his listeners to take up arms and mentions lawmakers by name. You and I both know he would be arrested (and justifiably so) in a heartbeat.
Justice Holmes and Free Speech
apop: Rulings of the courts in the US allow for free speech up to the point at which one "yells fire in a crowded room." The ruling that you comment upon seems fair and just, since violence was directly advocated and incited against specific persons for specific reasons. I hope the perpetrator serves hard time.
One key phrase from Mann's column
Maybe most anti-choice advocates are peaceful. Maybe the reason pro-choice advocates aren't impressed is because of these statistics for the US and Canada(from wikipedia):
9 murders, 17 attempted murders, 383 death threats, 153 incidents of assault or battery, 3 kidnappings, 655 bioterror threats, 41 bombings, 173 arsons, 91 attempted bombings or arsons, 619 bomb threats, 1630 incidents of trespassing, 1264 incidents of vandalism, and 100 attacks with butyric acid.
If Muslims had perpetrated this level of terrorism here, we'd have martial law at home and would probably have nuked several countries in the Mideast by now.
"who's to say late-term abortionists have an "absolute right" to live?"
And it is wrong to accuse the wingnuts of inciting violence. Cause most pro-lifers are peaceful!!
Yeah right.
apop
That charge is pure bunk. Garbage. Pathetic.
Is this what liberals stand for now?
Good grief.