The federal government and private industries want to invest in states with progressive energy policies. Kansas, with its ample supplies of natural gas, biofuels and wind, is in many ways an attractive destination.

But the Legislature’s Republican leadership is holding the state back by insisting that any energy-related legislation be tied to approval of two coal-fired power plants in Holcomb, Kan. Last year lawmakers failed three times to overturn a permit denial decision made by the administration of Gov. Kathleen Sebelius.

Now lawmakers are back again with another attempt to push the coal plants through. They have sent Sebelius a “comprehensive energy bill,” which basically strips the state secretary of health and environment of the ability to reject the plants.

The bill is almost certain to be vetoed — and should be — by either Sebelius or Lt. Gov. Mark Parkinson, who would step in if Sebelius leaves for a job in Washington. The coal plants, which would pollute Kansas air while sending most of the power to Colorado, are no more acceptable now than they were a year ago.

The pity is that the bill has some good provisions. It requires utilities to boost their use of energy from wind or other renewable sources, and encourages conservation in state buildings and vehicles.

Many states are backing away from coal plants because of costs, environmental risks and the likelihood of federal carbon taxes. The Kansas Legislature should set aside