By Mary Sanchez, Kansas City Star columnist
Of all the comments made recently about the drug-related murders in Mexico, among the most disappointing came from our new president.
Speaking at his recent prime-time press conference, Barack Obama declared that his administration would take a greater role in battling Mexican drug cartels. The number of agents at the border will more than double; extra resources will go to damming up the flow of guns into Mexico; and enhanced cooperation with Mexican authorities is promised.
Obama noted these measures would ensure “that the border communities in the United States are protected and you’re not seeing a spillover of violence, and that we are helping the Mexican government deal with a very challenging situation.”
With all due respect, Mr. President, the violence is already here. Take in the nightly news broadcast in virtually any major U.S. city, and you’ll see drug-related violence is rampant. For that matter, it spread long ago to places like Omaha and Nashville and Kansas City, where I live.
Oh, I know what Obama was referring to. He meant the outlandish bloodshed Mexico has suffered since President Felipe Calderon took office and declared war on drug cartels. A horror movie director couldn’t have scripted the gore any better.
Torture and murder between drug rivals are common, as are the beheadings of federal police who are both attempting to break the cartels and ferret out those in their own ranks who are involved. The tally of death rises daily, with more than 7,200 murders since the beginning of 2008.
This kind of violence — which threatens to plunge Mexican society into chaos — has stayed south of the border. But let’s be honest: It wouldn’t happen, and couldn’t happen, without accomplices on this side.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton got nearer to this truth recently in a startlingly frank comment as she set off to Mexico to meet with Calderon. “Our insatiable demand for illegal drugs fuels the drug trade,” Clinton said.
Bravo, finally a public admission of complicity from the top of the political food chain! However, let’s not stop at the Saturday night coke fiends, bong hitters and meth heads. Let’s talk about the businesses on this side of the border that supply the high-powered weapons to the Mexican cartels.
Let’s talk about how the money gets laundered stateside (drug dealing ain’t done in pesos, amigo). It’s all well and good to send a few more platoons of Homeland Security agents to the border, and to send Blackhawk helicopters and all manner of surveillance gizmos to Mexico. But our foremost efforts need to remain on this side of the border, where presumably they can have their greatest impact. Federal agents need to use every available measure to break the cartel’s foothold in the States, much as they did with the Mafia. A huge portion of the drugs consumed in the U.S. are ferried up through Mexico. We’re a $65 billion market for the cartels.
The Mexican drug lords did not seize the U.S. drug market overnight, but it did occur in something of a vacuum of concern. We’ve had our share of drug violence, to be sure. We’re just not inclined to assign responsibility to anybody but drug users and inner city folks caught up in the mess for quick profits or to feed their own addictions.
For too long Americans have been anesthetized to drug violence because the stories are so familiar and yet so distant from our own lives. Yet another poor black or Latino killed as they grub at the bottom rungs of the drug trade. Change the channel.
Only now, with the violence of Mexico threatening tourism there and terrifying people living in states like California, Texas and Arizona, is the general public becoming concerned. And yet, even President Obama doesn’t readily make the connection.
Yes, the reign of terror is unfolding in Mexico, but it is hardly “contained” there. It’s here, it’s entrenched, and it’s not going away on its own.
Distributed by Tribune Media Services
To reach Mary Sanchez, call 816-234-4752 or send e-mail to









Delicious
Digg
Lv sale , commonly referred
Lv sale , commonly referred to as
Louis Vuitton Saleya PM Replica
Louis Vuitton Summit Drive Replica
Louis Vuitton Summit Drive Replica
Louis Vuitton Marilyn PM Black Replica
Louis Vuitton Marilyn PM White Replica
Louis Vuitton Le Radieux Replica
Louis Vuitton Lockit MM Replica
Louis Vuitton Lockit PM Replica
Louis Vuitton Stanislav Replica
Louis Vuitton Nikolai Replica
Louis Vuitton DONUT CHAIN Bracelet Replica
Louis Vuitton OPEN MESH Bracelet Replica
Louis Vuitton Folded Earrings Replica
Louis Vuitton Round Circle Earring Replica
Louis Vuitton Dancing Shoese Pendant Replica
Louis Vuitton Flip Pendant Replica
Louis Vuitton New Britt Messenger Bag Replica
Louis Vuitton New Britt Messenger Bag Replica
Louis Vuitton Continental Wallet with D ring ornament Replica
Louis Vuitton Continental Wallet with D ring ornament Replica
Louis Vuitton Full Leather Long Wallet Replica
Louis Vuitton Full Leather Long Wallet Replica
Louis Vuitton Ellipse Purse Replica
Louis Vuitton Danube 21 Replica
Louis Vuitton Zippy Organizer Replica
Louis Vuitton Key Holder XL Replica
Louis Vuitton Globe Shopper Cabas PM - Burgundy Replica
Louis Vuitton Globe Shopper Cabas GM - Yellow Replica
Louis Vuitton Cruise Porte Epaule Raye MM Replica
Louis Vuitton Cruise Cabas Raye GM Replica
IT Certification Exam
, or sometimes shortened to wallets for sale has become one of the most Louis Vuitton Replica Agendas luxurybrands
I would have been surprised
I would have been surprised to hear that Mexico Drug War violence is not spreading in US... this news is something to be expected, I can only wish good luck to Obama in battling drug cartels.
Vick, California Drug Rehab Center counselor
Frankly I'm surprised
Mary actually made a positive comment regarding Hillary Clinton. She spent so much of her time trashing and ridiculing her during the primary--as if she had no skills or ability whatsoever.
the coming war
The border war, years undeclared, comes close to being recognized and named Operation _________. A few more months. Roots of the conflict, we’ve identified for years. A regional worry: Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California. Supply and demand: drugs, labor, weapons, real estate, transportation, cash.
This one’s been in the can for a long time. The military’s studied it but US ground forces may require adjustments of old laws to “apprehend”, close with, and engage hostile forces on our soil. Operations deep into foreign territory likely and probably ongoing.
Nation-building experience over the last six years may be employed closer to home. Afghanistan may receive a lower billing. Private military security contractors certainly formulating proposals. A few more months.
Tom Ryan
The Crossroads
Kansas City
http://crossroadscurrents.blogspot.com/
where has Sanchez
been for open borders? I don't recall her ever making that argument. She has argued for a path for legalization for immigrants, along the line of what Bush proposed:
A good way to approach the immigration problem would be to rework the numbers allowed legal entry, to control the borders better and to find a way to legalize those undocumented immigrants who have otherwise followed the law.
Those changes, in addition to deporting those with no valid reason to stay, would substantially decrease the illegal immigrant population, nipping the need for new prisons.
http://voices.kansascity.com/node/3662
That's a far cry from calling for open borders.
Could it be that you're mischaracterizing what she's said? It could, indeed. Classic Ann Coulter tactics.
Whoa, Mary
You really can't have it both ways. You can't be for open borders for those innocent Mexicans that just want to work (boohoo) and not have the criminal element just stand at the border wishing they knew how to benefit. No, additional border security for all purposes is the way. And please, don't pretend that Hillary Clinton was the first politician to understand the "insatiable demand for illegal drugs fuels the drug trade". Bush, Willie & Bush before her knew what was the culprit. It's called "supply & demand". But be careful, liberal politicians - you wouldn't want the Latinos to see you getting strong on illegal immigration - that would cost you some votes.