By Yael T. Abouhalkah, Kansas City Star Ediorial Page columnist
Barack Obama said Tuesday he won't allow Congress to stuff its next stimulus plan with costly earmarks.
What a naive warning from the president elect.
Of course the bill will have earmarks. Congress will be under tremendous pressure from states and cities -- Kansas City among them -- to pump hundreds of billions toward special projects sought by governments.
In fact, in the rush to spend money and stimulate the economy, the next bill out of Washington will receive even less scrutiny per dollar used than most spending plans that come out of Washington.
Now that's scary.
Congress is going to hardly listen to Obama's brave words of Tuesday: "We are going to ban all earmarks, the process by which individual members insert pet projects without review.... We're not going to be able to expect the American people to support this critical effort unless we take extraordinary steps to ensure that the investments are made wisely and managed well."
But once again, Obama was short of specifics on who's going to do that and how.
The answer is that Congress will be passing out money based on requests from states and cities, requests that will include plenty of earmarks, no matter what Obama says now.









Delicious
Digg
kenm_1262
Hey, I tried, Kenneth J. Miller. You don't want to listen, fine.
Safe?
Twas says Bush "kept us safe for 7+ years." Maybe, but that first year? Not so much.
Nukeman
The earmarks challange is change Obama or any other president can not win. All presidents have clamored for a line item veto specifically to address earmarks, but to date the law of the land does not give the president that tool. Congress will attach earmarks to everything regardless of what the President desires. I am going to give Obama a pass on Earmarks, it is congress that we should hold accountable on earmarks not presidents.
Seriously
SECOND test. First test was appointed positions: was he going to grade applicants by their devotion to the Democratic Party, or by competence? Volcker, or Brownie?
This will be the first test
This will be the first test for Obama's "change we can believe in". Let's give him a chance before we tear him a new one.
TWAS
I too am so pissed-off at Bush for his spending and lack of vetoes. All I can say, and I think all history will say, is that he kept us safe for 7+ years. For this I am thankful to the man, but, there always is a but, his social policies side sucked.
KCgrh
I don't know what Obama is going to do. I hope he is a good President. You may be right that he will fall right into liberal tax and spend (with pork), but I am not too happy with Bush either. What was it, his sixth or seventh year before he vetoed a bill? You have to admit he wasn't fiscally conservative. And the problem with that is that it removes some of the luster of our criticism of liberal tax & spenders. Yes, Bush cut taxes, which I am in favor, but he just couldn't stop the runaway spending. I think he was trying to be too many things to too many people. I respect your thoughts, but I am an optimist, until proven wrong.
Hey Edie run fast the troop train is leaving!
You wanna bet he won't back a bill with pork in it Edie? Talk is cheap, particularly with the Yommama......
This Will be the big 0's First Test at "Change we Can Believe In
We will soon find-out twas if 0 truly has enlarged gonads, or he is merely another politician who says one thing and does whatever winds his clock.
We could start a poll on this blog with each of our distinguished contributors voting simply yes-there will be earmarks, or no-there will not be earmarks. We can post them to this article, and I will volunteer to summarize the votes into one posting and keep it for future reference when the law is passed and the big 0 either signs it or vetoes it. I wonder what the record is for when a new President vetoed his first piece of legislation?
As expected, I vote a resounding YES.
Rouge steps in it big time
He's NOT backing a bill with pork in it, idiot. Read it this time.
Don't come here without your second cup of coffee in hand.