By Lewis Diuguid, Kansas City Star Editorial Page columnist
Kathleen Parker is on the right track in her recent column fingering religion as the culprit behind the hobbled state of the Republican Party.
But she didn’t go far enough. Robert N. Minor does in his 2007 book, "When Religion is an Addiction." Minor is a professor of religious studies at the University of Kansas.
Minor writes that the marriage of right-wing religion and politics “fulfilled the progressive needs of the religious addiction,” and the election of George W. Bush as president added to “the list of the addiction’s pushers.”
Minor calls the addiction to religion a “process addiction.” Other examples are addictions to gambling, sex and work. But an addiction to a faith causes some people to become “religiously righteous.” Minor says feeling is “similar to the high of cocaine.”
“Like the experience of the high in other addictions, the high of being righteous and on the side of goodness and the Divine numbs one against the worries, insecurities, threats and pain of other life experiences,” Minor writes.
“The high affirms momentarily the rightness, goodness and acceptability of the believer by no less than the Universe itself. And it distances believers from those other unrighteous people whom they would otherwise experience as threatening, as sinners who could challenge the religious and moralistic beliefs that the religious believe save them.”
Religious addicts see themselves as the persecuted victims, and they constantly seek a more intense high in promoting their righteousness cause. GOP politics and the election of Bush have been great outlets for the faithful.
Minor noted that “the feeling of righteousness could be restored and intensified by political victories, as if these victories proved they were okay.”
“Addictions, remember, are progressive and usually fatal to the addict.”
Bush’s popularity sinking and breaking apart like the Titanic also took down the religiously addicted base of the Republican Party and John McCain’s candidacy for the White House. The GOP, it appears, is going through some serious withdrawal symptoms.







Delicious
Digg
I don't often agree with
I don't often agree with Lewis because he is usually complaining about something associated with race which I believe makes him a racist as much as those he complains about. He is a really good writer with great insight when he leaves his usual domain. Again he is right on track. God belongs in church and home not in schools and government. Please deliver me from all those self sanctified, arrogant, and closed mind religion addicts.
Rad said,"it's about those
Rad said,"it's about those who seek power, influence, and have a slavish adherence to dogma. To those types any idea or belief that lies outside their strict interpretation according to dogma cannot be tolerated. If you are certain you're right then by definition everybody else has to be wrong."
That is a very good analysis. I like the way you worded it, Rad.
As for this columnist's religiously addicted base opinion-
What dogma is Lewis succumbing to?
I have to agree that it's
I have to agree that it's wrong to blame the religious themselves and I didn't read Parker's column that way. They are sincere in their beliefs. Rather, it's about those who seek power, influence, and have a slavish adherence to dogma. To those types any idea or belief that lies outside their strict interpretation according to dogma cannot be tolerated. If you are certain you're right then by definition everybody else has to be wrong. That's a problem for the Rebublicans that they're going to have to overcome or be marginalized. So far the only solutions they've come up with is to be more intolerate i.e. Kobach and the Kansas party.
Like Reagan democrats we may be looking at a decade or two of Obama republicans.
So glad to see that you are
So glad to see that you are not a Christian Mr. Diuduid. Hopefully the Star will fire you next. Most of us would be very glad to see you go.
I will state it here as I
I will state it here as I did on her column-
Let's call this what it is.
You say diversity, I say adversity.
You may say revolution, I say dilution.
People want to wave political banners around that have their rights written on them, and the truth of the matter is that one set up people have to give up or dilute their rights in order for others to exercise theirs. That is adversity as well as dilution.
Why blame God and Christian people for the plight of the republican party? Can you show more ignorance?
This whole election was a racial, generational and liberal victory all in one.
Is it fair for people to speculate that non white, younger athiests are carrying the Democratic party?
That would be a ludicrious, narrowminded statement to make- you cannot group everyone into a collective and call their rise or fall of influence based on one element.
You can however, witness the dilution of a nation by eliminating one.
Religious addiction? Oh yes, you can be addicted to religion. Religion is just a institution that has man made doctrine interpreting God's word and tailoring it to fit their own needs. That is RELIGION.
And many people do unfortunatley fall under a pious stance when they feel that their "religion alone" can drive and preserve the agendas of men, a political party or special group.
What I am seeing however, is an attack against anyone who practices FAITH IN GOD, who has conservative ideals and voices them. You cannot group everyone into a collective like that and place the blame of influence on one element( such as whether they are christian or not.)Making broad assumptions like that is so very pious, not to mention the audacity to say that having faith in God is a weakness or addiction and is a disease crippling a political party.
I myself, as a believer in God, do not need to see political victories in order to validate my faith, nor do I get high off of agendas won in the name of religious rights.
Only weak people will look at the core foundation of someone else's belief structure, and try to topple it by spewing bias or blame.
Stronger people find ways to overcome together.
Thanks for thinking of us,
Thanks for thinking of us, Lewis! Now get back to your normal race-bating columns.