Al Gore won't bring his climate change campaign to Barack Obama's administration. That's bad news for environmentalists.
Gore would have been a great champion of making sure Washington took global warming seriously. That would be a dramatic difference from the way President Bush has approached the situation.
Gore knows that his reputation -- as the winner of the Nobel prize for environmental education efforts -- gives him great publicity as a leader of the climate change advocates.
Gore spokeswoman Kalee Kreider told the Washington Times: "He feels very strong right now that the best thing for him to do is to build support for the bold changes that we have to make to solve the climate crisis."
Of course, Gore might have had a highly visible post with the Obama administration to push for those "bold changes."
But he also would have been constrained by how far the Obama administration would let him go in campaigning for needed action. And beyond that, Gore would have had to face the political reality that Congress might not want to go as far as he wants on global warming.
Now, by staying out of the D.C. loop, Gore is free to push for dramatic improvements, realizing he won't be blamed if they don't come true.
He can just point a finger at Obama and Congress, saying they didn't take his wonderful advice.









Delicious
Digg
Pity
he would've been a strong advocate for U.S. interests, either at EPA or as Secretary of State.
Thank God for one piece of good news.
The one thing our economy does not need right now is a rabid environmentalist heading the EPA. Don't take me wrong, I am pro environmental protection. But I believe it must be rational and measured, not reactionary and without sound science to support it. If Gore were at the helm of EPA, I fear we would see a rash of new regulations that would cause American businesses to spend more money on envirionmental protection and cut employment to cover the cost.
Excellent Point, oneobserver
I am also pro environmental protection, and I am also relieved for an additional, slightly different reason...
I believe that the appointment of Al Gore would be so divisive we would never be able to move past it towards true progress in protecting our environment in reasonable, sustainable and even profitable ways.
I appreciate what Al Gore has done on the environmental...
front and we could use some more like him. I am sure Gore does not want to be part of the politics - he wants to spend his time and energies on something he really believes in. He is out to help his fellow man regardless of the ignorance shown by many on this subject or those who know about the problems but their money and greed mentality is more important to them. Perfect example is the proposed Gardner, Ks. intermodal - elected officials time and time again have sold the people and their health down the river to cater to big biz and the developers for the almighty dollar.
You're both right. Gore is a
You're both right. Gore is a hypocritical, "the sky is falling, the sky is falling," alarmist and opportunist.
And he'd take a big pay cut!
He couldn't jump around the world on his private jet and give his paid false alarms to all of those people who think he's some sort green god. And the scientists are finally coming around and making him look like he's full of sh&%!
Good post, hawkins
Couldn't agree with you more.