By Yael T. Abouhalkah, Kansas City Star Editorial Page columnist

You knew this was coming: Former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer won't be charged in the prostitution scandal that forced him to resign in disgrace.

Too bad. He should have had to go on trial, to set an example for others.

The stated reason for letting him off the hook: He didn't spend public or campaign money on prostitutes.

But in reality, Spitzer also was helped by the fact that prosecutors often don't take a hard line on clients of prostitutes.

U.S. officials said Thursday that "we have concluded that the public interest would not be further advanced by filing criminal charges in this matter."

Of course, prosecuting a high-profile person like Spitzer actually might have been good for the "public interest."

It would have shown that prosecutors take these crimes seriously.

After all, if being involved with a prostitute was bad enough to cause Spitzer to resign, shouldn't he have been held accountable by the justice system?