Question of the Day

Of course! Sometimes they have to. It should have been done when they were experimenting on black people years ago. The similarities between this and the current stem cell debate are pretty strong in my opinion.

Years ago the black people they experimented on were considered something less than human yet the experiments were supposed to be for the benefit of humans.

Now the embyo is considered less than human but is supposedly essential for possible benefit to humans.

Human life should not be destroyed even if it benefits other human life.

Of course it was burried on page 18 in the Star today but did you see that the first real stem cell breakthrough came recently. It cured sickle cell in mice. It was done with the new process converting skin cells and NOT embryonic. Imagine that. In one month more progress with this technique than with years of embryonic research and using only a fraction of the resources.