By Mary Sanchez, Kansas City Star columnist
You remember critical thinking, don’t you? That skill you were supposed to pick up in civics class?
It’s conspicuously absent from political discourse these days. Instead, we get the “you hate America” kind of talk. Accusations that the other guy, or gal, is “elitist,” “sexist,” “racist,” or simply “disrespectful.” Often the same epithets are applied to people in the media who question a candidate too deeply.
Yet imagine a teacher telling a student he or she is being hostile by asking hard questions, doing too much research, looking beyond the slogans and thoroughly researching a candidate’s actual accomplishments.
The crux of our political derailment is that old devil, identity politics: voting for people because they seem “like us.”
Otherwise sane people seem to be succumbing to it. People like the nice man who wrote to me after reading a recent column questioning Sarah Palin’s credentials:
“She epitomizes what our forefathers looked for in citizens to step forward to be elected officials in our government,” wrote my correspondent, who read the column in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. “Citizens who have jobs, families and work like the vast majority of the rest of us.
“Not rich people who have several houses in different states, not people who probably haven’t held non-political jobs — ever. Not people who are so far removed from normal everyday life that they can’t relate to us and don’t know how much a gallon of milk costs or how much school tuition costs.”
Wait. He just described President Bush and Sen. John McCain, Palin’s running mate.
But what is more glaring about our derailment by identity politics is the unabashed rush to value the ordinary over the more qualified, simply because it seems more authentic. Palin, or any candidate who is of the masses, is preferable because she is so plain, so down home, so much more likely to be stuck in the line with everyone else at the local box store.
So now we’re seeking common folk status as a requirement for one of the most significant and powerful positions in the world? I gain no comfort sending to the White House a person who equals my level of international travel, time with heads of state and educational status.
The identity politics perspective — or severe lack of a broader perspective — is why people are comparing Obama’s Harvard law degree, his having been elected president of the Harvard Law Review, his time as a state senator and a U.S. senator, and are still coming away with the impression that Palin’s time spent earning one degree by attending four different colleges, having re-enrolled at one, is a sign of her superior intellect.
Oh, yes, and there is her “executive experience” of having led a town of 5,500 and a state of 650,000 people.
Some are attempting to compare Palin’s vita to Teddy Roosevelt’s. Both were in their mid-40s when nominated for VP, had numerous children, and could hunt and skin a moose. Comparisons of banal commonalities, folks, tell us nothing about Palin’s ability to govern.
To his great credit, my letter writer also indicated that he’s open to at least the ideal of incorporating information. That’s a sign he’s on the right path.
He wrote that effective elected leaders have been those who surrounded themselves with “political advisers, cabinet members, military advisers and a host of others,” and were “smart people who made intelligent, informed and decisive decisions.”
No nebulous nod to “She’s one of us” there.
Doris Kearns Goodwin, a prolific chronicler of past presidents, recently penned an essay noting that some of the most successful presidents exhibited self-control, a moral compass, a gift for inspiring others, self-confidence, the ability to learn from errors, a willingness to change, and emotional intelligence.
That’s more like the stuff we learned in civics class — or at least should have. Now if we could only find a way to make those lessons stick.
©2008, The Kansas City Star.
Distributed by Tribune Media Services
To reach Mary Sanchez call 816-234-4752 or send email to









Delicious
Digg
Palin Held Hostage In Republican Cult?
FREE SARAH PALIN!
I am starting to get concerned that Sarah Palin may actually be a hostage of the Republican right wing!! I know, I know! It sounds pretty far fetched, but we've heard about "Stockholm Syndrome". Maybe there is something to this. Say a "AIP Syndrome" or something? Consider the article (linked below) and also what you may already know about Mrs. Sarah "The Barracuda" Palin, a self described Pitbull in Lipstick.
Free Sarah, Day 27: If she can field dress a moose, she can handle reporters
But it's been 27 days since Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was picked to be John McCain's VP. And though she's potentially a heartbeat away from the presidency, and, we're told, ready to lead -- apparently the McCain campaign doesn't think she's ready to have a press conference or to take questions from reporters on the campaign trail.
(emphasis is mine)
Yeah, we know all about that there liberal media bias. According to her Bush team handlers, Mrs. Palin isn't going to be permitted to face these attack dogs. Why? What could happen? Would she wither and blow away? Would she cry? It seems pretty unlikely. She has a lot of personality (some would say that is ALL she's got!) and besides, she is (after all) running for Vice President of the most powerful country in the entire world.
As we've heard endlessly, she could easily become President of the United States if McCain doesn't finish his term for any reason (death or disability).
Even if you believe there is a liberal media (and lord knows, we've heard those reports over and over in the ...um... liberal media), that same liberal media will be there next year and presumably long after that, right? How long can she hide from them?
Even if you presume that the media in the US is an adversary and not really on the side of the American public that buys their products, what kind of "pitbull" hides from her adversaries? I know pitbulls, and Sarah is no pitbull.
So... Is she tough or isn't she?
FREE SARAH PALIN!
Shooting oneself in the foot: A primer
Why do I have difficulty reconciling the opening sentence, "These high powered females Like Barbara Walters and others stood up and told career women like myself that you could do it all if you chose to and still be a good Mom," with the concept of the writings of a "career woman"?
In any case, troll, if you'd like we can start off with your feminist heroine charging rape victims for their own rape kits in her picturesque little hamlet, and work upwards from there.
Does anybody find it odd?
These high powered females Like Barbara Walters and others stood up and told career women like myself that you could do it all if you chose to and still be a good Mom. Now suddenly, they line up to question her parenting because she has a Down Syndrome child and wants a high office. Suddely being a female Mayor/Governor in a Male dominated State is just a small matter and not equal to organizing protests and neighborhood efforts? The same people who praise women for winning seats in Congress, Mayors, and State wide seats now find Palin's accomplishments lacking?
I am an Independent who is a member of the Women's Political Caucus and any number of Women's groups. The minute they joined the anti woman chorus for the sake of Democrat Party affiliation they lost a member. P.S I liked Hillary for President. She and Palin represent accomplishments for women that we should all celebrate. I will not vote for a less qualified candidate because he is Black, a Democrat, personable or any other reason besides he is best for our country. I am voting for McCain not because I agree with everything he stands for but because I agree with more of what he can deliver than Obama. Guns and abortion are not my first concern. That's why I am Independent. I get tired of those two issues driving elections.
Instead of assuming ignorance, let's just RESEARCH IT, okay?
List of bills sponsored by Barack Obama
Or you can believe that hockey mom is a good pick. John McCain assured us that his choice would reassure Americans about his AGE and his frequent bouts with CANCER.
I am not reassured by this hockey mom, no matter how perky she seems. She is unqualified. Her town was slightly larger than my high school.
She changed colleges FOUR TIMES before getting a degree in journalism (that alone ought to enrage the right wing - don't they HATE the media LMAO)...
Obama is smarter and it really would be nice to have someone smart running things. If McCain dies in office, Sarah Barracuda will make Dubya look like Jefferson.
God IS part of the history of America
I don't know what you're talking about, Lezzle. I went to both public schools and private college, and religion was certainly acknowledged.
Perhaps you disagree that other religions than your own should be acknowledged?
Or perhaps you think that religion should be taught in science class?
Just a strange statement of yours.
As for your candidate being supported by a known terrorist, yes, Bush was bin Laden's wet dream, and we know that he would never have gotten a second term without playing directly into bin Laden's hands, but again, what's your point?
Public Discourse
Our public discourse in academia and the media is very one-sided. Most educated people would agree on this point. If a person has an opinion that God should be part of the history of America, for example, it is not politically correct. If a person disagrees with same sex marriage, for example, the content of this discussion is dismissed as too right wing for comment. If a person is opposed to a candidate whose rise to power was blatantly supported by a KNOWN terrorist, he is accused of being a nut. Whose lack of critical thinking are you exposing with this moronic essay? Your own.
I AM critically thinking, very critically
Today I heard a very dramatic Barack Obama advertisement (local a.m. radio station program) in which a mother bemoaned the fact that McCain supposedly wouldn't support "stem cell research." The fear and angst that the ad instilled was a LIE. Republicans are opposed to EMBRYONIC stem cell research, not adult stem cell research. This ad was deliberately misleading, Mary Sanchez. Why don't you write about this? Or is this critical thought too much for you and the RED STAR?
Mainstream_Media gives the lie to Mary Sanchez
What a stupid, liberal thing to say:
"Palin's defenders aren't thinking critically"
Can anyone doubt that Mainstream_Media's latest remarks, "This rag is a mirror image of Der Sturmer, the Nazi journal of hate. It's all left-wing hate all the time except when they're pimping for some scam for the local corrupt political establishment," are anything but fine, critical thinking and thoughtful expression at their finest? Thank you, once again, Mainstream_Media, for your insights, and for your brilliant, original, and ongoing development of the close resemblance to the Kansas City Star and the entire National Socialist experience in 20th century Germany.
They're all Democrat political hacks
This rag is a mirror image of Der Sturmer, the Nazi journal of hate. It's all left-wing hate all the time except when they're pimping for some scam for the local corrupt political establishment.
This could be a wonderful community if it had an honest newspaper that opposed corruption instead of being part of it.
Sanchez has shown time and again she is a democractic hack
along with most of her collegues at the Star. And she can't find any good reasons for folks to vote FOR Obama/Biden so all she can do is try to develop reasons Not to vote for McCain/Palin.
I wonder when the any of the Star bloggerswill have a positive post about anything related to the election. All they seem to be able to grasp is the negative.