By Mary Sanchez, Kansas City Star columnist
Once upon a time, during my gullible childhood years, I believed a person had to be well reasoned to be an author. That it took unique qualifications — a special calling, even — to write books. But I’ve matured, and have slagheap of chick lit as evidence to the contrary.
But no author besmirches the literary calling quite like Jerome R. Corsi, whose latest treatise, “The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality,” has managed to debut at the top of The New York Times’ best-seller list.
You may recall the name. Corsi co-authored — or shall we say, dredged up false allegations for — “Unfit for Command,” the 2004 book that questioned the Navy record of then-presidential candidate John Kerry.
If you’re wondering how this prolific writer finds his inspiration, consider what he told The New York Times: “The goal is to defeat Obama. I don’t want Obama to be in office.”
OK. That’s direct enough. But how about sticking to the truth this time? No, that is not Corsi’s way. This book is simply an attack.
Yes, there are plenty of plenty of scribblers on the left who play rough with Republicans, too. But Corsi is in his own category. He has never shrunk from an opportunity to slander. A few of his more widely available quotes:
He once described Islam as “a worthless, dangerous Satanic religion.” And he opined, “Boy buggering in both Islam and Catholicism is OK with the pope as long as it isn’t reported by the liberal press.”
And he has taken crude swipes at the Clintons, remarking, “...ask why HELLary couldn’t keep BJ Bill satisfied? Not lesbo or anything, is she?”
The statements tell you all you need to know about Corsi, though he later tried to discount them as attempts at humor.
Corsi also helped pen the story of the Minutemen, that band of wannabe border patrol agents who see themselves as integral to stopping unauthorized migration between the U.S. and Mexico. “Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America’s Borders” was co-authored by and partly about Minutemen leader Jim Gilchrist.
In the book, Corsi manages to cast the Catholic Church’s theologically based efforts to aid immigrants as an insurrection against the U.S. government. One chapter, “The Mess in Mexico: Poverty, Oil, NAFTA and the Threat to American Sovereignty,” is a common theme for Corsi: the idea that the U.S.A. that we love is on the verge of imploding.
Another Corsi opus, “The Late Great U.S.A.: The Coming Merger With Mexico and Canada,” discloses a far-flung conspiracy to reconfigure Canada, the U.S. and Mexico into one giant nation.
Corsi is adept at taking snippets of truth, and weaving them with alarmist language that panders to the fears of Americans beaten down by global competition and a rapidly changing economy. In other words, he’s playing to paranoia — exactly the type of dialogue voters do not need right now.
Oddly enough, the book’s attempts to smear Obama are lame and over-exposed this far into the presidential campaign.
Yes, Obama does salute the U.S. flag. Yes, he has admitted to smoking pot as a young man, like many solid citizens of his generation. He no longer partakes in recreational drug use, contrary to what Corsi implies. Finally, Obama is Christian, not a Muslim.
And, yes, compared to the rather bland stage presence of Sen. John McCain, Obama has a rock star gleam. Such charisma is neither reason to elect Obama president, nor is it a reason to dismiss him as a candidate.
Voters, whether they identify as Democrats and Republicans, deserve better than Corsi’s brand of slime. For Americans who want to learn more about the candidates, a better place to start would be to read how each man has written about his own life.
Pick up McCain’s “Faith of My Fathers” and Obama’s “Dreams from My Father” — and, please, skip this “best seller.”
To reach Mary Sanchez, send e-mail to .









Delicious
Digg
Exhibit A
"compared to the rather bland stage presence of Sen. John McCain, Obama has a rock star gleam"
Seriously? I saw Bruce last night and this comment is just laughable. No wonder the public thinks the press is working hard to get Obama elected.
The death of journalism continues.......
all correct
Sanchez, in her overall tone and description of Corsi's writings is pretty much on target...I have read 3....not much there ....But to suggest that there was no merit in the thematic charges of "Unfit for Command" is, simply delusional.
Obamas books were both easy, excellent reads. It's a shame... he seems to be not near as a good as his books were.
Balano, I believe, is spot on regarding the rapidly declining star readership. The publication makes no attempt at balanced, fair minded presentation of news or opinion. Any semblance of objectivity may be fairly viewed as a mistake. I personally know MANY people who have dropped subscrips because of that philosophy.
The star is, unfortunately, ideological centric. It would be far better for all if they were better business men with a keener understanding of the community that they serve.
Nice try
rather than condemn Corsi's lies and half-truths, Balano just tries to change the subject.
Nice try, Ross.
It is funny, though, to see you condemning anyone for allegedly playing fast and loose with truth.
Hypocrisy and irony, Balano's hallmarks.
Just saying....
I haven’t criticized the movie “W” yet even though I have a pretty good idea which way it will lean given Oliver Stone’s history.
Does anyone refuse to acknowledge the Dan Rather story (again, in the heat of an election) four years ago? That went beyond “inaccuracy” and all the way to fabrication and lies.
Michael Moore’s movies are always filled with inaccuracies and lean WAY left.
I’m just saying that I don’t recall Ms. Sanchez or anyone else at The Star blasting Rather or Moore. It’s my opinion that the lack of balance has cost them readers and revenue.
Ross Balano Midwest Voices 2008
it'll be interesting
to see if you manage to come up with any issues with factual inaccuracies in this "W" movie -- as Sanchez does with Corsi's book -- or if you'll just be bitching because it doesn't support your hyper-partisan right-wing bias, Ross.
As far as I can tell from your post, you have absolutely no basis for criticizing the film from a factual perspective -- you're just grousing because you perceive it as having a liberal bias, you partisan shill.
How about some objectivity.
Mary, I hope that you will write to advise similar cautions and concerns when Oliver Stone’s movie “W” is released (coincidentally right before the election) this fall.
I cannot recall reading where you ever wrote such criticism of Michael Moore or Dan Rather either. In case you did and I missed it would you please let me know?
There was another news release today that The Star is going to reduce staff again due to declining advertising revenue. Perhaps an attempt at objectivity and impartiality might bring back some readers and stop the financial bleeding there. By ALWAYS taking the liberal stance, you alienate roughly half of the population that could be readers. Advertisers won’t buy ads if you don’t have enough readers.
Ross Balano Midwest Voices 2008