By mary sanchez
Pray that you never need an advocate as much as those caught up in the Agriprocessors immigration raid in Postville, Iowa.
A lot of people are feeling soiled by the raid, which officials at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) initially bragged was the largest such operation in immigration history. Nearly 400 people were scooped up and shuffled in shackles to a fairground designed to hold cattle.
Now, three months after the raid at the kosher meatpacking plant, more details are emerging -- and attorneys, clergy, members of Congress and labor officials are decrying a major miscarriage of justice.
Translators and even local townspeople say they were duped into participating in a federal government plan to railroad exploited workers. And labor investigators complain that ICE overran an ongoing investigation into horrible working conditions in the Agriprocessors plant.
And for what? So that ICE could make its numbers look good. So that it could claim it had deported more "criminals."
At the heart of the Postville operation was a "hurry up and charge ’em" process that made it difficult, if not impossible, for attorneys to meet with the arrestees.
Immigration officials, it seems, were bent on charging the immigrants with higher crimes than simply working illegally. They wanted crimes punishable by mandatory jail time. The hook was some immigrants’ use of Social Security numbers not issued to them. That’s document fraud and identity theft, which everyone can agree is a bad thing.
But it’s not clear how many -- if any -- of the immigrants were knowingly using a real person’s identity to work at Agriprocessors. For the crime to rise to aggravated identity theft, which is what ICE officials were intent on charging the workers with, the suspects had to knowingly defraud those whose Social Security numbers they were using.
Many of the workers were Guatemalan Mayans, indigenous people who are not literate in Spanish, much less English. They were brought in groups of 10 before judges who held court in trailers. ICE was in a hurry because within 72 hours, statutes say, the suspects either had to be charged with a crime or released for deportation.
Observers and translators say many of the people didn’t even know what a Social Security card was. They reportedly had shown up for work and had their paperwork filled out by others employed by Agriprocessors. Almost 100 fraudulent green cards were found in the company’s human resources department.
The immigrants were offered a plea deal: Either take five months in jail and deportation, or serve as much as two years in jail if convicted. Guess what the workers chose?
Most of them just wanted to be reunited as quickly as possible with their families in Guatemala. So they took the plea. Now, nearly 300 sit in jails throughout the nation -- yes, at taxpayer expense -- serving their time and awaiting deportation.
Meanwhile, the Iowa labor investigation of Agriprocessors is getting back on track. State officials are attempting to document countless stories of chemical burns, broken bones, and amputations when body parts were caught in the machines of the plant, among other injuries. That’s in addition to accusations of child labor (one teen told of working 17-hour shifts) and of female workers being told their jobs could become easier in exchange for sexual favors.
But many of their witnesses have already been deported or have simply fled. So much for holding employers responsible for breaking the law.
Postville, Iowa. The name conjures Norman Rockwell civility, small-town values -- the moral fiber of America. Instead, it harbored a throwback to the hellish abattoirs chronicled by Upton Sinclair a century ago. And then it became, in the words of one federally certified translator brought in to help interpret for the hapless workers, "a judicial assembly line where the meat packers were mass processed."
(c)2008, The Kansas City Star
Distributed by Tribune Media Services, Inc.
To reach Mary Sanchez, send e-mail to .








Delicious
Digg
Owen
I'm not arguing they're innocent or shouldn't be deported -- rather, that the real culpability for the identity theft would lie with the employer who obtained and supplied the stolen SSNs.
Seems to me that the government would have a hard time proving identity theft crime against the illiterate illegals who had no idea where the SSNs came from.
Furthermore, they make lousy targets and a waste of our prosecutorial resources. Get 'em deported and work on the real identity theft criminals -- the employers who'll likely do it again until one or more of them is made an example of.
Pity the Feds couldn't work with the state so that the state could finish developing its workplace safety claims against the employer before all the immigrants were rounded up and taken away. Stupid.
Inquiry Finds Under-Age
Inquiry Finds Under-Age Workers at Meat Plant
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/06/us/06meat.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
State labor investigators have identified 57 under-age workers who were employed at a kosher meatpacking plant in Postville, Iowa, and have asked the attorney general to bring criminal charges against the company for child labor violations, Dave Neil, the Iowa Labor Commissioner, said on Tuesday.
“The investigation brings to light egregious violations of virtually every aspect of Iowa’s child labor laws,” Mr. Neil said in a statement announcing the results of a seven-month investigation at Agriprocessors, the nation’s largest kosher meat plant.
Illegal aliens may be one thing. Under aged workers are another as well.
Interface
Then if they got the IDs from the employer, they entered into a conspiracy to defraud the US govt and it's legal citizens.
Kick the illegals out. Arrest the owners and try them.
misguided
"Justice for whom? Ms. Sanchez: What about the people who's name and social security number are used?"
Seems like it's the employer who was complicit in the identity theft, and even more so than the workers. Sanchez's take on it sounds plausible. Illiterate workers who show up and x their name on whatever paperwork the employer tells them to do aren't the rightful object of your rancor.
Justice denied?
Justice for whom? Ms. Sanchez: What about the people who's name and social security number are used? Do you understand the mess their lives become and the supreme effort they have to make dealing with a dysfunctional system while trying to straighten this out? I would to see your interview about that! Your article seems a little one-sided, and upon scrutiny, possibly written by a member of the same tribe. Nearly every country guards its borders, and as someone commented earlier, intruders are put in prison or executed. We should have put up the fence years ago. Oh, and if fences didn't work, the one around the White House would have been gone long ago.
Everybody is supposed to win?
Says who? There are winners and losers in business. Some companies make it and some don't. Their employees suffer with a bad company and win with a successful company.
That being said, those people were treated like slaves. That's going to happen when people think it is okay to flaunt the laws of a country and go there illegally. When you commit a crime and want to lay low, out of sight of the authorities, you'll likely suffer most anything like these people did.
The owners should be prosecuted and jailed and the illegals shipped to their country of origin.
" ... attorneys, clergy,
" ... attorneys, clergy, members of Congress, labor officials, translators, local townspeople ..."
Wow. Another Mary Sanchez 'balanced' column on immigration, so balanced that she does not name ONE single attorney, clergyman, Congress member, labor official, translator or local townsperson which she so eloquently referred to. In other words, who knows who these people are and who knows how many there are? We of course have no idea, and we have no idea how many of the same there are that don't agree that ICE did anything wrong. I wouldn't know myself, but I do know that this story is Mary's opinion, not actual journalism, which of course is not the point of Midwest Voices - I just thought I'd point this out before readers rush away with a sense of outrage over the horrible people at ICE who are violating the non-existentent constitutional rights of people illegally in this country, and who may incorrectly assume that this is the only side to the story.
If Mary had not already allowed us to know her bias on the illegal immigration issue, through a series of columns she has written on this subject, then one might not be as quick as I was to read between the lines. Not to say that I am not biased - I am, I'm all for enforcing the laws on both illegals and their employers, and getting the fence up, entitlements gone and sanctuary cities denied federal funds. As far as sanctioning employers, I have always stated that the employers breaking the law should be hammered and, in cases like this, shut down, as well as deporting the illegals. I would not hesitate in doing so now.
But this type of column is all too typical of the MSM these days - emotional, heartfelt appeals on behalf of the "hapless" (Mary's own word), exploited illegals. Here's an idea - first, don't come into this country illegally and expect to be treated like a citizen and second, don't come in at all illegally and you won't have any problems like these, and bad employers cannot exploit you. Or is the United States no longer a nation of laws, but a nation of those who get to pick and choose which laws they like? As I said, I think the employer here should be shut down, because that employer also has no respect for the law - I'm saying that only based on the fact that they had so many illegals working for them and NOT because of any other allegations Mary has thrown at them.
p.s. For grins and chuckles, go back and reread Mary's story - you will notice that she NEVER refers to them as 'illegal aliens' or 'illegal immigrants', only as 'immigrants', 'arrestees', 'witnesses' and 'hapless workers' - you're naive if you think the choice of terms was not purposeful.
"Now, nearly 300 sit in jails throughout the nation -- yes, at taxpayer expense -- serving their time and awaiting deportation."
That's fine with me - I am glad my tax dollars are being used to enforce the law. Protection of borders is one of the prime responsibilities of ANY government, isn't it?
Which laws are good laws
Gee... today let me assume that all laws should be obeyed... particularly those regarding sovereignty of a nation. If you tried to cross the border without invitation into almost any country on earth, you risk being shot, executed, or imprisoned with absolutely NO help available from your own government - because - you are in someone else's country.
Ours is a country which belongs to every AMERICAN of every color and background who is AMERICAN. Prosecute and deport those who break in to our country and attempt to steal her resources. We owe them no part of the country we have built, but should they apply and should we desire to have them here because of a contribution they might make, we'll let them know when we're good and ready for them!
Justice for all....
Treating people like cattle just because they are here illegally is wrong. Not prosecuting the employers who deliberately are hiring them knowing they are illegal, paying them less than they would legal workers, less than minimum wages, not giving them health insurance, hurts all of us.
Our borders should be closed! Legal immigration is fine but all workers deserve a living wage. If employers cannot afford to pay it they are in the wrong business. Pay the CEO less and the workers more. Capitalism means the marketplace determines if the business is profitable. Everyone is supposed to win! Including the worker. If you can't pay the worker you don't deserve to be in business!
We don't need visas to allow cheap labor. This is a fallacy! Everyone is entitled to his share, the problem with business today is that Corporate upper management and the stock holder doesn't think labor deserves its share and profits have been skewed to reflect this.
As a nation we have to consider all the ramifications of our actions and this includes the effects of business on our environment and society. An advanced society would be sensitive to both. Corporations should be ivolved in the education of our youth and the conservation of our national resourses. It is a national tragedy that they are not. At least in the times of our first "robber barons," in spite of their money, we had philantrapists who put America first.
We got to this point by not enforcing our laws and....
the problems continue or get bigger because our laws are not enforced. The problem lies not only with the people who are illegally immigrating but even more disgraceful to me are the employers for many reasons, but mostly for money and greed reasons, are breaking our laws and the those laws also are not being enforced. I find politicians turning their heads time and time again to employers exploiting the illegal immigrants and breaking our laws. I blame the US people for wanting the cheap labor to keep their costs down.
Until we close and secure our borders and until we enforce all of our laws there will be trouble in River City. This is just not the fault of ICE - this is also the fault of the American people for not demanding that the right thing be done. The days of ethical behavior, integrity, honesty and other basic values continue to erode - we have no one but ourselves to blame for these problems in my opinion.