By Barb Shelly, Kansas City Star editorial page columnist

"I think we are concerned," Kansas City Councilman Bill Skaggs says about a lawsuit that an ex-employee has filed against the mayor, his wife and the city.

Concerned? Surely that is an understatement. Council members should be furious. They are once again being forced to deal with a mess created by Mayor Mark Funkhouser's refusal to separate his family life from his job.

The courts will decide whether there is merit in plaintiff Ruth Bates' claims that Gloria Squitiro, Funkhouser's wife, created a hostile work environment in the mayor's office.

But that question wouldn't be on the table if Funkhouser had not placed Squitiro--whose workplace demeanor is something short of professional--in the bizarre position of unpaid volunteer with the responsibilities of an office manager.

Deann Smith's story in today's Star quotes several legal sources who spoke to the folly of this arrangement.

"Kansas City Council members should be concerned about the liability of an unpaid staffer given authority to act on the mayor's behalf," University of Missouri-Kansas City Law School professor David Achtenberg said.

Actually, they should be livid. Many smart, well-meaning people tried to tell Funkhouser that his wife's role in his work would lead to trouble. Now it has. At the very least, Bates' lawsuit will distract the mayor and council from important things, like light rail planning. At the worst, it will cost the city money.

When Funkhouser moved from the city auditor's job to the mayor's office, I thought Kansas City was getting a leader who believed in best practices, who respected sound advice and who would always place the city's interests first.

That's not the way things have shaped up. Me, I'm beyond concerned. I'm angry.