By Yael T. Abouhalkah, Kansas City Star Editorial Page columnist
The NCAA needs to investigate the possibility that KU's Darrell Arthur didn't earn the grades needed in high school to let him play for the Jayhawks' 2008 national championship basketball team.
If Arthur wasn't on KU's team legitimately, the NCAA should strip KU of its national title.
That would send a strong message to high schools and to colleges that it truly matters whether athletes actually qualify for the teams they play on.
As The Star's story reports, Arthur wasn't eligible to even be playing on KU's national title team if the allegations are true.
So without Arthur, would KU have defeated Memphis in the 2008 NCAA title game -- much less a few other high-quality teams in the run to the championship?
The answer is simple: No.
The NCAA ought to clear up this question as soon as possible to determine whether the Jayhawks legitimately won the 2008 title.









"Well Put"
"If the NCAA lets KU keep its championship, the message that will send to high schools is loud and clear: the NCAA doesn’t really care if they obey the rules or not."
Are you serious or just a sycophant? How can you say that with straight face when the NCAA is the organization that gave the approval to let DA play...it wasn't KU's call...it's the NCAA who makes that call. The NCAA goofed up...not KU. Unless DA was getting awful grades at KU, they had no cause to suspend or dismiss him.
You either have a twisted sense of justice or you're an MU/KSU/UT fan who can't "turn it off". If Missouri or Texas or K-State were in the same boat as KU, I would be man enough to say "nah...not their fault...let em keep the title".
I got no problem stripping all of DA's college credit or taking away his ring (or whatever they give the students who win the tourney) but Rush, Collins, Robinson, et al. did nothing wrong and you better believe they'd likely want no part in him being on the team if this could potentially happen.
As a real-world comparison, if you do a background check in good faith and it comes up clean and you still take negative action (especially if the person is black...which DA obviously is), that is a lawsuit and you're going to lose it handily.
Never mind the fact that the alleged trangression occurred TWO YEARS AGO and this teacher is just now piping about it...not to mention it's AFTER two years of college and AFTER a national title has been won.
This story is either completely fake or this joker has exquisitely bad timing. If I was a teacher and someone changed the grade I legitimately assigned, I would raise a major stink ASAP. You hear the term "dirty trick" in politics? This one stinks like one in a bad way. It's either deceptive timing or outright deceit and KU should bear no punishment for either.