By Ross Balano, Midwest Voices Columnist 2008

Today the Supreme Court of the United States upheld Indiana’s voter identification law. In doing so it ruled that it is not unconstitutional to require a person to produce a photo I.D. in order to vote and that the state has a “valid interest” in deterring fraud.

The court rejected arguments against the Indiana law, considered the strictest in the country, and said that the law does not impose unjustified burdens on people who are old, poor or members of minority groups and less likely to have a drivers license or other acceptable photo identification.

The vote came down 6 to 3 in favor with John Paul Stevens writing the opinion and being joined by John Roberts, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito while only the three most liberal justices, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, David Souter, and Steven Breyer dissented.

This is a welcome, common sense ruling by the court. Hopefully it will open the door for the Missouri law which had been struck down in the courts to be revived.

No person who is not a citizen should be allowed to vote and citizens only once each.

There have been accusations of voter fraud in the Kansas City and St. Louis areas in recent elections. Requiring a voter to show a photo I.D. is a small inconvenience to help insure the integrity of an election.